Home >
Community >
Are melting points for mixtures of solids ALWAYS below the melting points of the individual components?
Upvote
23
Downvote
+ Mixtures
Posted by
Muhammad Tayyab
Are melting points for mixtures of solids ALWAYS below the melting points of the individual components?
The melting of a substance occurs when Gibbs free energy favors liquid.
That implies that entropy times T of the liquid at melting point equals
the binding energy of the solid, on a per-molecule basis.
Entropy of a random mixture is greater than entropy of a pure material, so one expects
the mixture will have a lower melting point. The only exception, would be
a mixture which reacts or otherwise causes a new crystal structure
to be favored, which has different binding energy than the pure
materials (this happens when calcium and oxygen combine to form lime, for
instance). Chemical reaction also destroys the 'random' nature of
the mixture, of course.
Some mixtures are not miscible in liquid form, so the liquid mixture doesn't occur.
Presumably oil and water has no increase in entropy due to mixing, and
no melting point depression is expected.
The melting of a substance occurs when Gibbs free energy favors liquid.That implies that entropy times T of the liquid at melting point equalsthe binding energy of the solid, on a per-molecule basis.
Entropy of a random mixture is greater than entropy of a pure material, so one expectsthe mixture will have a lower melting point. The only exception, would bea mixture which reacts or otherwise causes a new crystal structureto be favored, which has different binding energy than the purematerials (this happens when calcium and oxygen combine to form lime, forinstance). Chemical reaction also destroys the 'random' nature ofthe mixture, of course.
Some mixtures are not miscible in liquid form, so the liquid mixture doesn't occur.Presumably oil and water has no increase in entropy due to mixing, andno melting point depression is expected.
No. As a general rule of thumb, if two compounds are miscible in each other, that is they exhibit solid solution, then the melting point of a (chemical, not mechanical) mixture will be intermediate. If the two compounds are not miscible and it's only possible to make a mechanical mixture and not a chemical mixture, then you will have a lower melting point.
Let's try to see this with several examples of phase diagrams, taken from FACT.
...mixtures of compounds are going to have melting points lower than either of the components pure melting points.
This is called eutectic relationship, for example sodium chloride and sodium sulfate. There is no intermediate compound, and they have a eutectic relationship, where the melting point of any mixture is lower than the melting point of both compounds. Note that if you are not in the pure liquid field, you will have a pure compound together with a liquid that is a mixture.
Silver and gold are a good example for a case when there is complete miscibility. All intermediate compounds can exist, therefore the melting point of the mixture changes continuously with the composition:
The double line is there because there is a very thin temperature range in which a liquid coexists with the solid of a different composition. See the solid solution page for more about that.
These were two simple cases. More complex cases arise when you have discrete compounds rather than a complete solution solution. A rather good example is cerium and nickel:
This system consists of several eutectic and peritectic points.
No. As a general rule of thumb, if two compounds are miscible in each other, that is they exhibit solid solution, then the melting point of a (chemical, not mechanical) mixture will be intermediate. If the two compounds are not miscible and it's only possible to make a mechanical mixture and not a chemical mixture, then you will have a lower melting point.
Let's try to see this with several examples of phase diagrams, taken from FACT.
...mixtures of compounds are going to have melting points lower than either of the components pure melting points.
This is called eutectic relationship, for example sodium chloride and sodium sulfate. There is no intermediate compound, and they have a eutectic relationship, where the melting point of any mixture is lower than the melting point of both compounds. Note that if you are not in the pure liquid field, you will have a pure compound together with a liquid that is a mixture.
Silver and gold are a good example for a case when there is complete miscibility. All intermediate compounds can exist, therefore the melting point of the mixture changes continuously with the composition:
The double line is there because there is a very thin temperature range in which a liquid coexists with the solid of a different composition. See the solid solution page for more about that.
These were two simple cases. More complex cases arise when you have discrete compounds rather than a complete solution solution. A rather good example is cerium and nickel:
This system consists of several eutectic and peritectic points.
The melting of a substance occurs when Gibbs free energy favors liquid. That implies that entropy times T of the liquid at melting point equals the binding energy of the solid, on a per-molecule basis.
Entropy of a random mixture is greater than entropy of a pure material, so one expects the mixture will have a lower melting point. The only exception, would be a mixture which reacts or otherwise causes a new crystal structure to be favored, which has different binding energy than the pure materials (this happens when calcium and oxygen combine to form lime, for instance). Chemical reaction also destroys the 'random' nature of the mixture, of course.
Some mixtures are not miscible in liquid form, so the liquid mixture doesn't occur. Presumably oil and water has no increase in entropy due to mixing, and no melting point depression is expected.
The melting of a substance occurs when Gibbs free energy favors liquid.That implies that entropy times T of the liquid at melting point equalsthe binding energy of the solid, on a per-molecule basis.
Entropy of a random mixture is greater than entropy of a pure material, so one expectsthe mixture will have a lower melting point. The only exception, would bea mixture which reacts or otherwise causes a new crystal structureto be favored, which has different binding energy than the purematerials (this happens when calcium and oxygen combine to form lime, forinstance). Chemical reaction also destroys the 'random' nature ofthe mixture, of course.
Some mixtures are not miscible in liquid form, so the liquid mixture doesn't occur.Presumably oil and water has no increase in entropy due to mixing, andno melting point depression is expected.
More
VOTE
No. As a general rule of thumb, if two compounds are miscible in each other, that is they exhibit solid solution, then the melting point of a (chemical, not mechanical) mixture will be intermediate. If the two compounds are not miscible and it's only possible to make a mechanical mixture and not a chemical mixture, then you will have a lower melting point.
Let's try to see this with several examples of phase diagrams, taken from FACT.
This is called eutectic relationship, for example sodium chloride and sodium sulfate. There is no intermediate compound, and they have a eutectic relationship, where the melting point of any mixture is lower than the melting point of both compounds. Note that if you are not in the pure liquid field, you will have a pure compound together with a liquid that is a mixture.
Silver and gold are a good example for a case when there is complete miscibility. All intermediate compounds can exist, therefore the melting point of the mixture changes continuously with the composition:
The double line is there because there is a very thin temperature range in which a liquid coexists with the solid of a different composition. See the solid solution page for more about that.
These were two simple cases. More complex cases arise when you have discrete compounds rather than a complete solution solution. A rather good example is cerium and nickel:
This system consists of several eutectic and peritectic points.
No. As a general rule of thumb, if two compounds are miscible in each other, that is they exhibit solid solution, then the melting point of a (chemical, not mechanical) mixture will be intermediate. If the two compounds are not miscible and it's only possible to make a mechanical mixture and not a chemical mixture, then you will have a lower melting point.
Let's try to see this with several examples of phase diagrams, taken from FACT.
This is called eutectic relationship, for example sodium chloride and sodium sulfate. There is no intermediate compound, and they have a eutectic relationship, where the melting point of any mixture is lower than the melting point of both compounds. Note that if you are not in the pure liquid field, you will have a pure compound together with a liquid that is a mixture.
Silver and gold are a good example for a case when there is complete miscibility. All intermediate compounds can exist, therefore the melting point of the mixture changes continuously with the composition:
The double line is there because there is a very thin temperature range in which a liquid coexists with the solid of a different composition. See the solid solution page for more about that.
These were two simple cases. More complex cases arise when you have discrete compounds rather than a complete solution solution. A rather good example is cerium and nickel:
This system consists of several eutectic and peritectic points.
More
VOTE