Home >
Community >
Bonding and coordination of oxygen in a Ga2O3 crystal structure [duplicate]
Upvote
26
Downvote
+ Crystallography
+ Chemistry
Posted by
Marvo Sharks
Bonding and coordination of oxygen in a Ga2O3 crystal structure [duplicate]
Does it help if you think of this as an ionic compound? In ionic compounds, there are no directed bonds. The coordination number depends on the size of the ions, coupled with the need for electroneutrality.
For example, in calcium oxide, both calcium and oxygen (in red) have octahedral coordination, with 6 neighbors each:
Granted, the electronegativity difference in calcium oxide is 2.44, while in gallium oxide it is only 1.65, and not different from that of silicon oxide, which has a network covalent structure.
Also, consider structure like that of hexagonal ice, where each oxygen is surrounded by four hydrogen atoms, two connected by covalent bonds, and two connected by hydrogen bonds. In this case, the atomic distances are clearly different, and you would be correct to say that oxygen makes two bonds, with a tetrahedral coordination if you consider the hydrogen atoms from neighboring atoms.
To distinguish these three extremes (ionic bonds in one case, covalent bonds plus contacts with neighboring atoms, network covalent structure) and to categorize what is going on with gallium oxide, you would have to look at the gallium oxygen bond lengths, which should be available in the paper you cite.
Does it help if you think of this as an ionic compound? In ionic compounds, there are no directed bonds. The coordination number depends on the size of the ions, coupled with the need for electroneutrality.
For example, in calcium oxide, both calcium and oxygen (in red) have octahedral coordination, with 6 neighbors each:
Granted, the electronegativity difference in calcium oxide is 2.44, while in gallium oxide it is only 1.65, and not different from that of silicon oxide, which has a network covalent structure.
Also, consider structure like that of hexagonal ice, where each oxygen is surrounded by four hydrogen atoms, two connected by covalent bonds, and two connected by hydrogen bonds. In this case, the atomic distances are clearly different, and you would be correct to say that oxygen makes two bonds, with a tetrahedral coordination if you consider the hydrogen atoms from neighboring atoms.
To distinguish these three extremes (ionic bonds in one case, covalent bonds plus contacts with neighboring atoms, network covalent structure) and to categorize what is going on with gallium oxide, you would have to look at the gallium oxygen bond lengths, which should be available in the paper you cite.
Thank you Karsten! So if I understand correctly, I should not assume the stick in the above ball-and-stick models are always representing covalent bonds. Instead the can represent any bond, and I should look to bond length for guidance. Yes, there are definitely different bond lengths of gallium oxide crystal. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction!More
Does it help if you think of this as an ionic compound? In ionic compounds, there are no directed bonds. The coordination number depends on the size of the ions, coupled with the need for electroneutrality.
For example, in calcium oxide, both calcium and oxygen (in red) have octahedral coordination, with 6 neighbors each:
Granted, the electronegativity difference in calcium oxide is 2.44, while in gallium oxide it is only 1.65, and not different from that of silicon oxide, which has a network covalent structure.
Also, consider structure like that of hexagonal ice, where each oxygen is surrounded by four hydrogen atoms, two connected by covalent bonds, and two connected by hydrogen bonds. In this case, the atomic distances are clearly different, and you would be correct to say that oxygen makes two bonds, with a tetrahedral coordination if you consider the hydrogen atoms from neighboring atoms.
To distinguish these three extremes (ionic bonds in one case, covalent bonds plus contacts with neighboring atoms, network covalent structure) and to categorize what is going on with gallium oxide, you would have to look at the gallium oxygen bond lengths, which should be available in the paper you cite.
Does it help if you think of this as an ionic compound? In ionic compounds, there are no directed bonds. The coordination number depends on the size of the ions, coupled with the need for electroneutrality.
For example, in calcium oxide, both calcium and oxygen (in red) have octahedral coordination, with 6 neighbors each:
Granted, the electronegativity difference in calcium oxide is 2.44, while in gallium oxide it is only 1.65, and not different from that of silicon oxide, which has a network covalent structure.
Also, consider structure like that of hexagonal ice, where each oxygen is surrounded by four hydrogen atoms, two connected by covalent bonds, and two connected by hydrogen bonds. In this case, the atomic distances are clearly different, and you would be correct to say that oxygen makes two bonds, with a tetrahedral coordination if you consider the hydrogen atoms from neighboring atoms.
To distinguish these three extremes (ionic bonds in one case, covalent bonds plus contacts with neighboring atoms, network covalent structure) and to categorize what is going on with gallium oxide, you would have to look at the gallium oxygen bond lengths, which should be available in the paper you cite.
More
VOTE
VOTE