Home >
Community >
Molecular geometry of BaH2 according to VSEPR theory
Upvote
VOTE
Downvote
+ Chemistry
+ Hydrogen
Posted by
Martha Kirtley
Molecular geometry of BaH2 according to VSEPR theory
There is a d-Orbital-Contributions to HOMO in d0 MX2-Complexes.
All higher‐level calculations show SrH2 and BaH2 to be bent with angles of ∼140° and 120°, respectively, while CaH2 is linear with a flat potential‐energy surface for the bending motion.
The use of a core‐polarization potential together with the 2‐valence‐electron pseudopotential approach allows an investigation of the relative importance of core‐polarization vs direct d‐orbital bonding participation as reasons for the bent structures. The calculations strongly suggest that both contribute to the bending in SrH2 and BaH2. Thus, the bent structure of [BaH2] may be considered to arise from a stabilization of the b2 HOMO upon bending by mixing in metal dyz character in second-order perturbation theory.
This observation has been rationalized successfully by an increased involvement of (n - 1)d-orbitals in the bonding as M gets larger,19-21
and by the influence of core-polarization interactions between the M and X sites.2 Elements in the d-block have relatively high atomic masses and they tend to have stereochemically inactive electron pairs.
There is a d-Orbital-Contributions to HOMO in d0 MX2-Complexes.
All higher‐level calculations show SrH2 and BaH2 to be bent with angles of ∼140° and 120°, respectively, while CaH2 is linear with a flat potential‐energy surface for the bending motion.
The use of a core‐polarization potential together with the 2‐valence‐electron pseudopotential approach allows an investigation of the relative importance of core‐polarization vs direct d‐orbital bonding participation as reasons for the bent structures. The calculations strongly suggest that both contribute to the bending in SrH2 and BaH2. Thus, the bent structure of [BaH2] may be considered to arise from a stabilization of the b2 HOMO upon bending by mixing in metal dyz character in second-order perturbation theory.
This observation has been rationalized successfully by an increased involvement of (n - 1)d-orbitals in the bonding as M gets larger,19-21and by the influence of core-polarization interactions between the M and X sites.2 Elements in the d-block have relatively high atomic masses and they tend to have stereochemically inactive electron pairs.
There is a d-Orbital-Contributions to HOMO in d0 MX2-Complexes.
All higher‐level calculations show SrH2 and BaH2 to be bent with angles of ∼140° and 120°, respectively, while CaH2 is linear with a flat potential‐energy surface for the bending motion.
The use of a core‐polarization potential together with the 2‐valence‐electron pseudopotential approach allows an investigation of the relative importance of core‐polarization vs direct d‐orbital bonding participation as reasons for the bent structures. The calculations strongly suggest that both contribute to the bending in SrH2 and BaH2. Thus, the bent structure of [BaH2] may be considered to arise from a stabilization of the b2 HOMO upon bending by mixing in metal dyz character in second-order perturbation theory.
Reference: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/232777714.pdf http://www.chimdocet-inorganica.it/SITO_ESERCIZI/Complementi/COMP1/VSEPREccezioni.pdf
This observation has been rationalized successfully by an increased involvement of (n - 1)d-orbitals in the bonding as M gets larger,19-21 and by the influence of core-polarization interactions between the M and X sites.2 Elements in the d-block have relatively high atomic masses and they tend to have stereochemically inactive electron pairs.
There is a d-Orbital-Contributions to HOMO in d0 MX2-Complexes.
All higher‐level calculations show SrH2 and BaH2 to be bent with angles of ∼140° and 120°, respectively, while CaH2 is linear with a flat potential‐energy surface for the bending motion.
The use of a core‐polarization potential together with the 2‐valence‐electron pseudopotential approach allows an investigation of the relative importance of core‐polarization vs direct d‐orbital bonding participation as reasons for the bent structures. The calculations strongly suggest that both contribute to the bending in SrH2 and BaH2. Thus, the bent structure of [BaH2] may be considered to arise from a stabilization of the b2 HOMO upon bending by mixing in metal dyz character in second-order perturbation theory.
Reference:https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/232777714.pdfhttp://www.chimdocet-inorganica.it/SITO_ESERCIZI/Complementi/COMP1/VSEPREccezioni.pdf
This observation has been rationalized successfully by an increased involvement of (n - 1)d-orbitals in the bonding as M gets larger,19-21and by the influence of core-polarization interactions between the M and X sites.2 Elements in the d-block have relatively high atomic masses and they tend to have stereochemically inactive electron pairs.
More
VOTE