In the acid-base equilibrium involving KOH and naphthol, where does the equilibrium lie?
2-naphthol pka= 9.5 H2O pka= 15
2-naphthol + OH- -----> naphtholate + H2O
The equilibrium should be shifted towards the products.
( I thought NaOH should be added in large excess so I had anyway also some OH- anions that competes with naphtholate. ) must KOH/NaOH be added in stochiometric quantity? So it all reacts with the naphthol....
In the acid-base equilibrium involving KOH and naphthol, where does the equilibrium lie?
2-naphthol pka= 9.5 H2O pka= 15
2-naphthol + OH- -----> naphtholate + H2O
The equilibrium should be shifted towards the products.
( I thought NaOH should be added in large excess so I had anyway also some OH- anions that competes with naphtholate. ) must KOH/NaOH be added in stochiometric quantity? So it all reacts with the naphthol....
Naphtolate ion is much softer nucleophile then OH- and reacts faster.
Is it much more softer than OH- because its negative charge is delocalized on the two rings...is it correct?
But how can I say that CH2CH3I is a soft electrophile? Because the C-I carbon has only a small partial positive charge?
I've never used the hard-soft theory in order to predict the competition between two nucleophiles in a Sn2 reaction...usually I say that stronger nucleophile is the species that will attack the substrate. (In in this case was OH- the stronger nucleophile)
Naphtolate ion is much softer nucleophile then OH- and reacts faster.
Is it much more softer than OH- because its negative charge is delocalized on the two rings...is it correct?
But how can I say that CH2CH3I is a soft electrophile? Because the C-I carbon has only a small partial positive charge?
I've never used the hard-soft theory in order to predict the competition between two nucleophiles in a Sn2 reaction...usually I say that stronger nucleophile is the species that will attack the substrate. (In in this case was OH- the stronger nucleophile)
The naphtolate is more polarizable just as the ethyl iodide, that makes them softer. You can compare, a ester carbonyl is a hard electrophile and it will not be attacked by naphtolate but by hydroxide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSAB_theory
The naphtolate is more polarizable just as the ethyl iodide, that makes them softer. You can compare, a ester carbonyl is a hard electrophile and it will not be attacked by naphtolate but by hydroxide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSAB_theory
2-naphthol pka= 9.5
H2O pka= 15
2-naphthol + OH- -----> naphtholate + H2O
The equilibrium should be shifted towards the products.
( I thought NaOH should be added in large excess so I had anyway also some OH- anions that competes with naphtholate. )
must KOH/NaOH be added in stochiometric quantity? So it all reacts with the naphthol....
thanks
2-naphthol pka= 9.5
H2O pka= 15
2-naphthol + OH- -----> naphtholate + H2O
The equilibrium should be shifted towards the products.
( I thought NaOH should be added in large excess so I had anyway also some OH- anions that competes with naphtholate. )
must KOH/NaOH be added in stochiometric quantity? So it all reacts with the naphthol....
thanks
More
VOTE
More
VOTE
Is it much more softer than OH- because its negative charge is delocalized on the two rings...is it correct?
But how can I say that CH2CH3I is a soft electrophile?
Because the C-I carbon has only a small partial positive charge?
I've never used the hard-soft theory in order to predict the competition between two nucleophiles in a Sn2 reaction...usually I say that stronger nucleophile is the species that will attack the substrate. (In in this case was OH- the stronger nucleophile)
Thanks
Is it much more softer than OH- because its negative charge is delocalized on the two rings...is it correct?
But how can I say that CH2CH3I is a soft electrophile?
Because the C-I carbon has only a small partial positive charge?
I've never used the hard-soft theory in order to predict the competition between two nucleophiles in a Sn2 reaction...usually I say that stronger nucleophile is the species that will attack the substrate. (In in this case was OH- the stronger nucleophile)
Thanks
More
VOTE
More
VOTE
More
VOTE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSAB_theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSAB_theory
More
VOTE
More
VOTE