You basically deny the method of decoloring. Where can there be other ways? If you want it, you may try to use a mask or the like, cover up the color.
Although I do n’t know why you eliminated activated carbon, you still want to say that activated carbon should be regarded as the best way for economic benefits and effects. The problem is to find the right activated carbon. After all, activated carbon and activated carbon are not the same
You basically deny the method of decoloring. Where can there be other ways? If you want it, you may try to use a mask or the like, cover up the color.
Although I do n’t know why you eliminated activated carbon, you still want to say that activated carbon should be regarded as the best way for economic benefits and effects. The problem is to find the right activated carbon. After all, activated carbon and activated carbon are not the same
First of all, thank you for your reply. I have done all the methods I have said. In fact, no matter which method, it is measured between cost and benefits.What is used now is the activated carbon out of color. The leader asked us to find a new loose agent. First, the ability of activated carbon offseeing is limited, and then the cost of hazardous waste treatment is too high.It is the blue oil mentioned above. The decolorization effect is good and there is no hazardous waste, but the amount is not easy to control. Now I hope to find a luminous agent like a blue oil, but I hope that the color is colorless.There are many ways to have adverse effects. There are many ways to disconnect and have been tried, but considering costs and actual benefits, many of them are not adopted. The comprehensive decolorization method is very good. We can do it.Profit, but the comprehensive color off what you say, I try it, thank you very much
First of all, thank you for your reply. I have done all the methods I have said. In fact, no matter which method, it is measured between cost and benefits.What is used now is the activated carbon out of color. The leader asked us to find a new loose agent. First, the ability of activated carbon offseeing is limited, and then the cost of hazardous waste treatment is too high.It is the blue oil mentioned above. The decolorization effect is good and there is no hazardous waste, but the amount is not easy to control. Now I hope to find a luminous agent like a blue oil, but I hope that the color is colorless.There are many ways to have adverse effects. There are many ways to disconnect and have been tried, but considering costs and actual benefits, many of them are not adopted. The comprehensive decolorization method is very good. We can do it.Profit, but the comprehensive color off what you say, I try it, thank you very much
More
VOTE
More
VOTE
If you want it, you may try to use a mask or the like, cover up the color.
Although I do n’t know why you eliminated activated carbon, you still want to say that activated carbon should be regarded as the best way for economic benefits and effects. The problem is to find the right activated carbon. After all, activated carbon and activated carbon are not the same
If you want it, you may try to use a mask or the like, cover up the color.
Although I do n’t know why you eliminated activated carbon, you still want to say that activated carbon should be regarded as the best way for economic benefits and effects. The problem is to find the right activated carbon. After all, activated carbon and activated carbon are not the same
More
VOTE
More
VOTE