Home >
Community >
What do the prefixes meta, ortho, pyro mean in inorganic chemistry?
Upvote
27
Downvote
+ Nomenclature
Posted by
Michael Lodman
What do the prefixes meta, ortho, pyro mean in inorganic chemistry?
In the older literature, the prefixes “hypo-”, “per-”, “ortho-”, “meta-”, and “pyro-” were used in some cases for the distinction between different acids with the same characteristic element.
The prefix “hypo-” was used to denote a lower oxidation state, and the prefix “per-” was used to designate a higher oxidation state. (The prefix “per-” is not be confused with the prefix “peroxo-”.)
Various traditional names are retained for use in IUPAC nomenclature, though the number of retained names has been reduced with each succeeding edition of the IUPAC recommendations. The Second Edition (1970 Rules) of the IUPAC Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (published in 1971) still included all of the above-mentioned prefixes; however, the approved use was limited to only some selected retained names. The further development and the current situation of the nomenclature are well explained in @Jan’s thorough answer.
In the older literature, the prefixes “hypo-”, “per-”, “ortho-”, “meta-”, and “pyro-” were used in some cases for the distinction between different acids with the same characteristic element.
The prefix “hypo-” was used to denote a lower oxidation state, and the prefix “per-” was used to designate a higher oxidation state. (The prefix “per-” is not be confused with the prefix “peroxo-”.)
Various traditional names are retained for use in IUPAC nomenclature, though the number of retained names has been reduced with each succeeding edition of the IUPAC recommendations. The Second Edition (1970 Rules) of the IUPAC Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (published in 1971) still included all of the above-mentioned prefixes; however, the approved use was limited to only some selected retained names. The further development and the current situation of the nomenclature are well explained in @Jan’s thorough answer.
In the older literature, the prefixes “hypo-”, “per-”, “ortho-”, “meta-”, and “pyro-” were used in some cases for the distinction between different acids with the same characteristic element.
The prefix “hypo-” was used to denote a lower oxidation state, and the prefix “per-” was used to designate a higher oxidation state. (The prefix “per-” is not be confused with the prefix “peroxo-”.)
The prefixes “ortho-” and “meta-” were used to distinguish acids differing in the formal content of water.
The prefix “pyro-” was used to designate an acid that is formally formed by removing one molecule of water from two molecules of an ortho-acid.
Various traditional names are retained for use in IUPAC nomenclature, though the number of retained names has been reduced with each succeeding edition of the IUPAC recommendations. The Second Edition (1970 Rules) of the IUPAC Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (published in 1971) still included all of the above-mentioned prefixes; however, the approved use was limited to only some selected retained names. The further development and the current situation of the nomenclature are well explained in @Jan’s thorough answer.
In the older literature, the prefixes “hypo-”, “per-”, “ortho-”, “meta-”, and “pyro-” were used in some cases for the distinction between different acids with the same characteristic element.
The prefix “hypo-” was used to denote a lower oxidation state, and the prefix “per-” was used to designate a higher oxidation state. (The prefix “per-” is not be confused with the prefix “peroxo-”.)
The prefixes “ortho-” and “meta-” were used to distinguish acids differing in the formal content of water.
The prefix “pyro-” was used to designate an acid that is formally formed by removing one molecule of water from two molecules of an ortho-acid.
Various traditional names are retained for use in IUPAC nomenclature, though the number of retained names has been reduced with each succeeding edition of the IUPAC recommendations. The Second Edition (1970 Rules) of the IUPAC Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (published in 1971) still included all of the above-mentioned prefixes; however, the approved use was limited to only some selected retained names. The further development and the current situation of the nomenclature are well explained in @Jan’s thorough answer.
More
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE