Home >
Community >
What does it mean to share similarities among living organisms "both horizontally and vertically"?
Upvote
26
Downvote
+ Taxonomy
Posted by
Ned Kaufman
What does it mean to share similarities among living organisms "both horizontally and vertically"?
Horizontally refers to organisms alive at the same time, All living organisms share similar genes.
Vertically means into the past and presumably future. How both fossils and genetics show relationships between ancestors and descendants.
Basically the sentence is saying When you study biology and how organisms relate to one another, you see massive amounts of organized similarities in organisms both backwards through time and in extant animals inherited from common ancestors. these similarities form a predictable pattern best explained as a complex web of relatedness stretching backwards in time.
When you realize these and a lot of taxonomic terms originated from paleontology and thus ultimately geology, in which organism relationships were discussed before genetics were even discovered, it makes more sense. phylogenetic trees would have been overlaid on geologic sections. Horizontal groups were organisms in the same horizontal layer of rock thus presumably alive at the same time, vertical meant vertical depth in the rock which was of course different time periods, the deeper you go the further back in time you went. It is a poor choice of wording for a textbook, the less jargon the better, but completely normal in the scientific literature.
here is an example of one of those early combined geologic, taxonomic "trees"
Horizontally refers to organisms alive at the same time, All living organisms share similar genes.
Vertically means into the past and presumably future. How both fossils and genetics show relationships between ancestors and descendants.
Basically the sentence is saying When you study biology and how organisms relate to one another, you see massive amounts of organized similarities in organisms both backwards through time and in extant animals inherited from common ancestors. these similarities form a predictable pattern best explained as a complex web of relatedness stretching backwards in time.
When you realize these and a lot of taxonomic terms originated from paleontology and thus ultimately geology, in which organism relationships were discussed before genetics were even discovered, it makes more sense. phylogenetic trees would have been overlaid on geologic sections. Horizontal groups were organisms in the same horizontal layer of rock thus presumably alive at the same time, vertical meant vertical depth in the rock which was of course different time periods, the deeper you go the further back in time you went. It is a poor choice of wording for a textbook, the less jargon the better, but completely normal in the scientific literature.
here is an example of one of those early combined geologic, taxonomic "trees"
Ben Bolker's comment is correct; the next sentence in the passage helps to clarify (bold added):
The biggest spin off
of such studies was the recognition of the sharing of similarities among
living organisms both horizontally and vertically. That all present day
living organisms are related to each other and also to all organisms
that ever lived on this earth, was a revelation which humbled man and
led to cultural movements for conservation of biodiversity.
The relationship between species in the present day are the horizontal relationships; one can define species horizontally by looking at and grouping organisms existing today (or at any other time "slice"). You can compare species horizontally by, say, looking at the skull of a human and the skull of a chimpanzee.
The relationship between species today and species that have existed in the past are the vertical relationships. For example, you could look at the skull of a modern horse and compare it to the skull of Mesohippus.
I've included a couple sources below that use this distinction, though I'm not sure where it originates.
I'd say the "horizontal" terminology comes up more frequently and may be more familiar, for example in reference to horizontal gene transfer one is talking about genetic material moving between species living at the same time. "Vertical gene transfer" can also be defined as the transmission of genetic information from parent to offspring, but more typically you would just call it inheritance.
Alvarez-Venegas, R., Sadder, M., Tikhonov, A., & Avramova, Z. (2006). Origin of the bacterial SET domain genes: vertical or horizontal?. Molecular biology and evolution, 24(2), 482-497.
Stamos, D. N. (2002). Species, languages, and the horizontal/vertical distinction. Biology and Philosophy, 17(2), 171-198.
Ben Bolker's comment is correct; the next sentence in the passage helps to clarify (bold added):
The biggest spin off of such studies was the recognition of the sharing of similarities among living organisms both horizontally and vertically. That all present day living organisms are related to each other and also to all organisms that ever lived on this earth, was a revelation which humbled man and led to cultural movements for conservation of biodiversity.
The relationship between species in the present day are the horizontal relationships; one can define species horizontally by looking at and grouping organisms existing today (or at any other time "slice"). You can compare species horizontally by, say, looking at the skull of a human and the skull of a chimpanzee.
The relationship between species today and species that have existed in the past are the vertical relationships. For example, you could look at the skull of a modern horse and compare it to the skull of Mesohippus.
I've included a couple sources below that use this distinction, though I'm not sure where it originates.
I'd say the "horizontal" terminology comes up more frequently and may be more familiar, for example in reference to horizontal gene transfer one is talking about genetic material moving between species living at the same time. "Vertical gene transfer" can also be defined as the transmission of genetic information from parent to offspring, but more typically you would just call it inheritance.
Alvarez-Venegas, R., Sadder, M., Tikhonov, A., & Avramova, Z. (2006). Origin of the bacterial SET domain genes: vertical or horizontal?. Molecular biology and evolution, 24(2), 482-497.
Stamos, D. N. (2002). Species, languages, and the horizontal/vertical distinction. Biology and Philosophy, 17(2), 171-198.
although in the OPs case horizontal relatedness is not being assumed to be due to horizontal gene transfer, but just due to inheriting genes from a common ancestor.More
Horizontally refers to organisms alive at the same time, All living organisms share similar genes.
Vertically means into the past and presumably future. How both fossils and genetics show relationships between ancestors and descendants.
Basically the sentence is saying When you study biology and how organisms relate to one another, you see massive amounts of organized similarities in organisms both backwards through time and in extant animals inherited from common ancestors. these similarities form a predictable pattern best explained as a complex web of relatedness stretching backwards in time.
When you realize these and a lot of taxonomic terms originated from paleontology and thus ultimately geology, in which organism relationships were discussed before genetics were even discovered, it makes more sense. phylogenetic trees would have been overlaid on geologic sections. Horizontal groups were organisms in the same horizontal layer of rock thus presumably alive at the same time, vertical meant vertical depth in the rock which was of course different time periods, the deeper you go the further back in time you went. It is a poor choice of wording for a textbook, the less jargon the better, but completely normal in the scientific literature.
here is an example of one of those early combined geologic, taxonomic "trees"
http://museum2.utep.edu/mammalogy/systematics1.htm
Horizontally refers to organisms alive at the same time, All living organisms share similar genes.
Vertically means into the past and presumably future. How both fossils and genetics show relationships between ancestors and descendants.
Basically the sentence is saying When you study biology and how organisms relate to one another, you see massive amounts of organized similarities in organisms both backwards through time and in extant animals inherited from common ancestors. these similarities form a predictable pattern best explained as a complex web of relatedness stretching backwards in time.
When you realize these and a lot of taxonomic terms originated from paleontology and thus ultimately geology, in which organism relationships were discussed before genetics were even discovered, it makes more sense. phylogenetic trees would have been overlaid on geologic sections. Horizontal groups were organisms in the same horizontal layer of rock thus presumably alive at the same time, vertical meant vertical depth in the rock which was of course different time periods, the deeper you go the further back in time you went. It is a poor choice of wording for a textbook, the less jargon the better, but completely normal in the scientific literature.
here is an example of one of those early combined geologic, taxonomic "trees"
http://museum2.utep.edu/mammalogy/systematics1.htm
More
VOTE
Ben Bolker's comment is correct; the next sentence in the passage helps to clarify (bold added):
The relationship between species in the present day are the horizontal relationships; one can define species horizontally by looking at and grouping organisms existing today (or at any other time "slice"). You can compare species horizontally by, say, looking at the skull of a human and the skull of a chimpanzee.
The relationship between species today and species that have existed in the past are the vertical relationships. For example, you could look at the skull of a modern horse and compare it to the skull of Mesohippus.
I've included a couple sources below that use this distinction, though I'm not sure where it originates.
I'd say the "horizontal" terminology comes up more frequently and may be more familiar, for example in reference to horizontal gene transfer one is talking about genetic material moving between species living at the same time. "Vertical gene transfer" can also be defined as the transmission of genetic information from parent to offspring, but more typically you would just call it inheritance.
Alvarez-Venegas, R., Sadder, M., Tikhonov, A., & Avramova, Z. (2006). Origin of the bacterial SET domain genes: vertical or horizontal?. Molecular biology and evolution, 24(2), 482-497.
Stamos, D. N. (2002). Species, languages, and the horizontal/vertical distinction. Biology and Philosophy, 17(2), 171-198.
Ben Bolker's comment is correct; the next sentence in the passage helps to clarify (bold added):
The relationship between species in the present day are the horizontal relationships; one can define species horizontally by looking at and grouping organisms existing today (or at any other time "slice"). You can compare species horizontally by, say, looking at the skull of a human and the skull of a chimpanzee.
The relationship between species today and species that have existed in the past are the vertical relationships. For example, you could look at the skull of a modern horse and compare it to the skull of Mesohippus.
I've included a couple sources below that use this distinction, though I'm not sure where it originates.
I'd say the "horizontal" terminology comes up more frequently and may be more familiar, for example in reference to horizontal gene transfer one is talking about genetic material moving between species living at the same time. "Vertical gene transfer" can also be defined as the transmission of genetic information from parent to offspring, but more typically you would just call it inheritance.
Alvarez-Venegas, R., Sadder, M., Tikhonov, A., & Avramova, Z. (2006). Origin of the bacterial SET domain genes: vertical or horizontal?. Molecular biology and evolution, 24(2), 482-497.
Stamos, D. N. (2002). Species, languages, and the horizontal/vertical distinction. Biology and Philosophy, 17(2), 171-198.
More
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE