Home >
Community >
What happens when prop-2-en-1-ol reacts with concentrated hydrogen bromide
Upvote
25
Downvote
+ Erratum
+ Alcohols
+ Chemistry
Posted by
Michael C Grasso
What happens when prop-2-en-1-ol reacts with concentrated hydrogen bromide
Rather than trying to rationalise what the question wants to know, I ran a quick SciFinder search. One of the first results was the following reaction, reported for the perdeuterated allyl alcohol by Thiem, Mohn and Heesing in 1985:[1]
Scheme 1: Reaction of perdeuterated allyl alcohol with $\ce{HBr}$. All implicit hydrogens in this scheme are deuterium atoms.[1]
Thiem, Mohn and Heesing do not go into details regarding the mechanism, but as I commented it really doesn’t matter whether the reaction follows a $\mathrm{S_N1}$, $\mathrm{S_N2}$ or $\mathrm{S_N2'}$ mechanism, since the final product will always be the same. In any case, the first step will be protonation of the hydroxy group to turn it into a better leaving group.
Another one of the first results was the following, reported by Karki and Magolan in 2015:[2] Scheme 2: Reaction of normal allylic alcohol with $48~\%\ \ce{HBr}$ in DMSO/chloroform.[2]
Their proposed mechanism includes the in situ creation of $\ce{Me2S^+-Br}$ which will then react with the double bond giving a bromonium ion; this will then be captured by a second bromide to give 2,3-dibromopropan-1-ol.
I was unable to find single-step reactions of allyl alcohol with hydrogen bromide leading to either 2-bromopropan-1-ol (which would imply a single Markovnikov addition of $\ce{HBr}$ onto the double bond), 1,2-dibromopropane (which would imply Markovnikov hydrobromination of the double bond of allyl bromide) or 1,3-dibromoprop-1-ene (where I have no clue how exactly that would be generated from allyl alcohol in the first place). Funnily enough, you state that this last product, C according to your scheme be the correct answer. I challenge the exam.
References:
[1]: J. Thiem, H. Mohn, A. Heesing, Synthesis1985, 775. DOI: 10.1055/s-1985-31344.
Rather than trying to rationalise what the question wants to know, I ran a quick SciFinder search. One of the first results was the following reaction, reported for the perdeuterated allyl alcohol by Thiem, Mohn and Heesing in 1985:[1]
Scheme 1: Reaction of perdeuterated allyl alcohol with $\ce{HBr}$. All implicit hydrogens in this scheme are deuterium atoms.[1]
Thiem, Mohn and Heesing do not go into details regarding the mechanism, but as I commented it really doesn’t matter whether the reaction follows a $\mathrm{S_N1}$, $\mathrm{S_N2}$ or $\mathrm{S_N2'}$ mechanism, since the final product will always be the same. In any case, the first step will be protonation of the hydroxy group to turn it into a better leaving group.
Another one of the first results was the following, reported by Karki and Magolan in 2015:[2] Scheme 2: Reaction of normal allylic alcohol with $48~\%\ \ce{HBr}$ in DMSO/chloroform.[2]
Their proposed mechanism includes the in situ creation of $\ce{Me2S^+-Br}$ which will then react with the double bond giving a bromonium ion; this will then be captured by a second bromide to give 2,3-dibromopropan-1-ol.
I was unable to find single-step reactions of allyl alcohol with hydrogen bromide leading to either 2-bromopropan-1-ol (which would imply a single Markovnikov addition of $\ce{HBr}$ onto the double bond), 1,2-dibromopropane (which would imply Markovnikov hydrobromination of the double bond of allyl bromide) or 1,3-dibromoprop-1-ene (where I have no clue how exactly that would be generated from allyl alcohol in the first place). Funnily enough, you state that this last product, C according to your scheme be the correct answer. I challenge the exam.
References:
[1]: J. Thiem, H. Mohn, A. Heesing, Synthesis1985, 775. DOI: 10.1055/s-1985-31344.
Can you form 1,2,3-tribromopropane via a combination of the two reactions and then eliminate one of the bromides? Not sure why it wouldnt eliminate anything else though...More
I found a patent dating back to the 1930s in which the dichloro homologue of C was produced in almost quantitative yield via Hydrochlorination. Long reaction time (100 hours) at 50-70C. When it was discovered, it was a surprise (they say) but I presume people didn't leave hot-plate stirrers going for days....
With this in mind, I decided to find out if Hydroiodination would yield 1,3-diiodoprope-1-ene (C analogue). Will hydroiodination live up to the theory?
It turns out that it's a rather difficult compound to come by with only 1 synthesis offered and that was hard to find:
To a solution of (Z)-1-iodo-3-methanesulfonyloxy-1-propene (3.40 g, 13.0 mmol) in acetone (18.6 ml) was added sodium iodide (1.94 g. 13.0 mmol) at 0 OC. The mixtute was stirred at RT for 2h. diluted with ether, and filtered The filtrate was washed with 10% aqueous Na2S203 and brine, dried (NazS04). and concentrated. The product was purified by silica gel chromatography (hexane) to give (3.19 g, 83%) as a dark red oil.
If I have missed a simple synthesis then I can only apologize but the stuff doesn't have a CAS. Searching for (E/Z ignored) '1,3-diiodoprop-1-ene' yields almost nothing so try '1,3-diidopropene' which if you think about it, describes it! IUPAC can be no help.
I found a patent dating back to the 1930s in which the dichloro homologue of C was produced in almost quantitative yield via Hydrochlorination. Long reaction time (100 hours) at 50-70C. When it was discovered, it was a surprise (they say) but I presume people didn't leave hot-plate stirrers going for days....
With this in mind, I decided to find out if Hydroiodination would yield 1,3-diiodoprope-1-ene (C analogue). Will hydroiodination live up to the theory?
It turns out that it's a rather difficult compound to come by with only 1 synthesis offered and that was hard to find:
To a solution of (Z)-1-iodo-3-methanesulfonyloxy-1-propene (3.40 g, 13.0 mmol) in acetone (18.6 ml) was added sodium iodide (1.94 g. 13.0 mmol) at 0 OC. The mixtute was stirred at RT for 2h. diluted with ether, and filtered The filtrate was washed with 10% aqueous Na2S203 and brine, dried (NazS04). and concentrated. The product was purified by silica gel chromatography (hexane) to give (3.19 g, 83%) as a dark red oil.
If I have missed a simple synthesis then I can only apologize but the stuff doesn't have a CAS. Searching for (E/Z ignored) '1,3-diiodoprop-1-ene' yields almost nothing so try '1,3-diidopropene' which if you think about it, describes it! IUPAC can be no help.
Rather than trying to rationalise what the question wants to know, I ran a quick SciFinder search. One of the first results was the following reaction, reported for the perdeuterated allyl alcohol by Thiem, Mohn and Heesing in 1985:[1]
Scheme 1: Reaction of perdeuterated allyl alcohol with $\ce{HBr}$. All implicit hydrogens in this scheme are deuterium atoms.[1]
Thiem, Mohn and Heesing do not go into details regarding the mechanism, but as I commented it really doesn’t matter whether the reaction follows a $\mathrm{S_N1}$, $\mathrm{S_N2}$ or $\mathrm{S_N2'}$ mechanism, since the final product will always be the same. In any case, the first step will be protonation of the hydroxy group to turn it into a better leaving group.
Another one of the first results was the following, reported by Karki and Magolan in 2015:[2]
Scheme 2: Reaction of normal allylic alcohol with $48~\%\ \ce{HBr}$ in DMSO/chloroform.[2]
Their proposed mechanism includes the in situ creation of $\ce{Me2S^+-Br}$ which will then react with the double bond giving a bromonium ion; this will then be captured by a second bromide to give 2,3-dibromopropan-1-ol.
I was unable to find single-step reactions of allyl alcohol with hydrogen bromide leading to either 2-bromopropan-1-ol (which would imply a single Markovnikov addition of $\ce{HBr}$ onto the double bond), 1,2-dibromopropane (which would imply Markovnikov hydrobromination of the double bond of allyl bromide) or 1,3-dibromoprop-1-ene (where I have no clue how exactly that would be generated from allyl alcohol in the first place). Funnily enough, you state that this last product, C according to your scheme be the correct answer. I challenge the exam.
References:
[1]: J. Thiem, H. Mohn, A. Heesing, Synthesis 1985, 775. DOI: 10.1055/s-1985-31344.
[2]: M. Karki, J. Magolan, J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 3701. DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00211.
Rather than trying to rationalise what the question wants to know, I ran a quick SciFinder search. One of the first results was the following reaction, reported for the perdeuterated allyl alcohol by Thiem, Mohn and Heesing in 1985:[1]
Scheme 1: Reaction of perdeuterated allyl alcohol with $\ce{HBr}$. All implicit hydrogens in this scheme are deuterium atoms.[1]
Thiem, Mohn and Heesing do not go into details regarding the mechanism, but as I commented it really doesn’t matter whether the reaction follows a $\mathrm{S_N1}$, $\mathrm{S_N2}$ or $\mathrm{S_N2'}$ mechanism, since the final product will always be the same. In any case, the first step will be protonation of the hydroxy group to turn it into a better leaving group.
Another one of the first results was the following, reported by Karki and Magolan in 2015:[2]
Scheme 2: Reaction of normal allylic alcohol with $48~\%\ \ce{HBr}$ in DMSO/chloroform.[2]
Their proposed mechanism includes the in situ creation of $\ce{Me2S^+-Br}$ which will then react with the double bond giving a bromonium ion; this will then be captured by a second bromide to give 2,3-dibromopropan-1-ol.
I was unable to find single-step reactions of allyl alcohol with hydrogen bromide leading to either 2-bromopropan-1-ol (which would imply a single Markovnikov addition of $\ce{HBr}$ onto the double bond), 1,2-dibromopropane (which would imply Markovnikov hydrobromination of the double bond of allyl bromide) or 1,3-dibromoprop-1-ene (where I have no clue how exactly that would be generated from allyl alcohol in the first place). Funnily enough, you state that this last product, C according to your scheme be the correct answer. I challenge the exam.
References:
[1]: J. Thiem, H. Mohn, A. Heesing, Synthesis 1985, 775. DOI: 10.1055/s-1985-31344.
[2]: M. Karki, J. Magolan, J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 3701. DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00211.
More
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
I found a patent dating back to the 1930s in which the dichloro homologue of C was produced in almost quantitative yield via Hydrochlorination. Long reaction time (100 hours) at 50-70C. When it was discovered, it was a surprise (they say) but I presume people didn't leave hot-plate stirrers going for days....
With this in mind, I decided to find out if Hydroiodination would yield 1,3-diiodoprope-1-ene (C analogue). Will hydroiodination live up to the theory?
It turns out that it's a rather difficult compound to come by with only 1 synthesis offered and that was hard to find:
To a solution of (Z)-1-iodo-3-methanesulfonyloxy-1-propene (3.40 g, 13.0 mmol) in acetone (18.6 ml) was added sodium iodide (1.94 g. 13.0 mmol) at 0 OC. The mixtute was stirred at RT for 2h. diluted with ether, and filtered The filtrate was washed with 10% aqueous Na2S203 and brine, dried (NazS04). and concentrated. The product was purified by silica gel chromatography (hexane) to give (3.19 g, 83%) as a dark red oil.
If I have missed a simple synthesis then I can only apologize but the stuff doesn't have a CAS. Searching for (E/Z ignored) '1,3-diiodoprop-1-ene' yields almost nothing so try '1,3-diidopropene' which if you think about it, describes it! IUPAC can be no help.
I found a patent dating back to the 1930s in which the dichloro homologue of C was produced in almost quantitative yield via Hydrochlorination. Long reaction time (100 hours) at 50-70C. When it was discovered, it was a surprise (they say) but I presume people didn't leave hot-plate stirrers going for days....
With this in mind, I decided to find out if Hydroiodination would yield 1,3-diiodoprope-1-ene (C analogue). Will hydroiodination live up to the theory?
It turns out that it's a rather difficult compound to come by with only 1 synthesis offered and that was hard to find:
To a solution of (Z)-1-iodo-3-methanesulfonyloxy-1-propene (3.40 g, 13.0 mmol) in acetone (18.6 ml) was added sodium iodide (1.94 g. 13.0 mmol) at 0 OC. The mixtute was stirred at RT for 2h. diluted with ether, and filtered The filtrate was washed with 10% aqueous Na2S203 and brine, dried (NazS04). and concentrated. The product was purified by silica gel chromatography (hexane) to give (3.19 g, 83%) as a dark red oil.
If I have missed a simple synthesis then I can only apologize but the stuff doesn't have a CAS. Searching for (E/Z ignored) '1,3-diiodoprop-1-ene' yields almost nothing so try '1,3-diidopropene' which if you think about it, describes it! IUPAC can be no help.
More
VOTE