Home >
Community >
What is the expected 31P NMR signal for ruthenium complexes...
Upvote
30
Downvote
+ Inorganic chemistry
+ Phosphines
+ Chemistry
Posted by
Kiva
What is the expected 31P NMR signal for ruthenium complexes...
If you have a complex containing PPh3 ligands, and you want to know if they are cis or trans, look at the coupling constants. Trans coupling is much larger than cis. If you suspect that your complex is cis, you can make the analogous complex using dppe (which will always be cis), and see if the spectra are similar.
If you have a complex containing PPh3 ligands, and you want to know if they are cis or trans, look at the coupling constants. Trans coupling is much larger than cis. If you suspect that your complex is cis, you can make the analogous complex using dppe (which will always be cis), and see if the spectra are similar.
If you have a complex containing PPh3 ligands, and you want to know if they are cis or trans, look at the coupling constants. Trans coupling is much larger than cis. If you suspect that your complex is cis, you can make the analogous complex using dppe (which will always be cis), and see if the spectra are similar.
If you have a complex containing PPh3 ligands, and you want to know if they are cis or trans, look at the coupling constants. Trans coupling is much larger than cis. If you suspect that your complex is cis, you can make the analogous complex using dppe (which will always be cis), and see if the spectra are similar.
The chemical shift of Ru-bound PPh3 ligands depends linearly on the Ru-P bond length. A chemical shift of about 10 ppm is associated with a long Ru-P bond of about 2.45 A. A chemical shift of about 95 ppm is associated with a short Ru-P bond of about 2.20 A. See Inorg Chem (1991) 30, 4617. There may not be any P-P coupling if the two P atoms are chemically equivalent. However, splitting in the aryl region of the 13C NMR spectrum can be used to determine if two PPh3 are cis or trans. See ref 16 of the above-mentioned paper.
The chemical shift of Ru-bound PPh3 ligands depends linearly on the Ru-P bond length. A chemical shift of about 10 ppm is associated with a long Ru-P bond of about 2.45 A. A chemical shift of about 95 ppm is associated with a short Ru-P bond of about 2.20 A. See Inorg Chem (1991) 30, 4617. There may not be any P-P coupling if the two P atoms are chemically equivalent. However, splitting in the aryl region of the 13C NMR spectrum can be used to determine if two PPh3 are cis or trans. See ref 16 of the above-mentioned paper.
Hi, I am also working on PPh3 based metal precursors. Ruthenium itself has many precursors like Ru(CO)Cl(PPh3) , Ru(p cymene )(Cl)(PPh3) and RuCl2(PPh3)3. Mostly the PPh3 signals are found at 31 ppm.
Hi, I am also working on PPh3 based metal precursors. Ruthenium itself has many precursors like Ru(CO)Cl(PPh3) , Ru(p cymene )(Cl)(PPh3) and RuCl2(PPh3)3. Mostly the PPh3 signals are found at 31 ppm.
If you have a complex containing PPh3 ligands, and you want to know if they are cis or trans, look at the coupling constants. Trans coupling is much larger than cis. If you suspect that your complex is cis, you can make the analogous complex using dppe (which will always be cis), and see if the spectra are similar.
If you have a complex containing PPh3 ligands, and you want to know if they are cis or trans, look at the coupling constants. Trans coupling is much larger than cis. If you suspect that your complex is cis, you can make the analogous complex using dppe (which will always be cis), and see if the spectra are similar.
More
VOTE
If you have a complex containing PPh3 ligands, and you want to know if they are cis or trans, look at the coupling constants. Trans coupling is much larger than cis. If you suspect that your complex is cis, you can make the analogous complex using dppe (which will always be cis), and see if the spectra are similar.
If you have a complex containing PPh3 ligands, and you want to know if they are cis or trans, look at the coupling constants. Trans coupling is much larger than cis. If you suspect that your complex is cis, you can make the analogous complex using dppe (which will always be cis), and see if the spectra are similar.
More
VOTE
The chemical shift of Ru-bound PPh3 ligands depends linearly on the Ru-P bond length. A chemical shift of about 10 ppm is associated with a long Ru-P bond of about 2.45 A. A chemical shift of about 95 ppm is associated with a short Ru-P bond of about 2.20 A. See Inorg Chem (1991) 30, 4617.
There may not be any P-P coupling if the two P atoms are chemically equivalent. However, splitting in the aryl region of the 13C NMR spectrum can be used to determine if two PPh3 are cis or trans. See ref 16 of the above-mentioned paper.
The chemical shift of Ru-bound PPh3 ligands depends linearly on the Ru-P bond length. A chemical shift of about 10 ppm is associated with a long Ru-P bond of about 2.45 A. A chemical shift of about 95 ppm is associated with a short Ru-P bond of about 2.20 A. See Inorg Chem (1991) 30, 4617.
There may not be any P-P coupling if the two P atoms are chemically equivalent. However, splitting in the aryl region of the 13C NMR spectrum can be used to determine if two PPh3 are cis or trans. See ref 16 of the above-mentioned paper.
More
VOTE
Hi, I am also working on PPh3 based metal precursors. Ruthenium itself has many precursors like Ru(CO)Cl(PPh3) , Ru(p cymene )(Cl)(PPh3) and RuCl2(PPh3)3. Mostly the PPh3 signals are found at 31 ppm.
Hi, I am also working on PPh3 based metal precursors. Ruthenium itself has many precursors like Ru(CO)Cl(PPh3) , Ru(p cymene )(Cl)(PPh3) and RuCl2(PPh3)3. Mostly the PPh3 signals are found at 31 ppm.
More
VOTE
The signal depends on the other ligands.
For example: [RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(C5H4NCOO)], where C5H4NCOO = 2-pyridinecarboxylate the 31P NMR signal is at 31.61 ppm.
Similar value of 31.41 is observed for [RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(C9H6NO)], C9H6NO=8-quinolinol.
And:
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(HBIm)], HBmI =2-(hydroxymethyl)benzimidazole 42.09 ppm
[RuH(CO)(PPh3)2(1,10-phen)]Cl.H2O.(CH3)2O 1,10-phenanthroline 46.15 ppm
[RuCl2(HBO)(PPh3)2] 29.41
[RuCl(CO)(HBO)(PPh3)2] 37.05 HBO=2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole
[RuHCl(CO(PPh3)2(H2NPhBIm)] H2NPhBIm= 2-aminophenylbenzimidazole 45.15
[RuH(N3)(CO)(PPh3)3] 40.11
[RuH(NCO)(CO)(PPh3)3] 40.48
[Ru(BIm-2-COO)2(PPh3)2].CH3OH.H2O BIm-2-COO=benzimidazolecarboxylate 48.50
[RuCl2(MeIm-2-COO)(PPh3)2] MeIm-2-COO=1-methyl-1H-imidazole-2-carboxylate 38.42, 30.42
[Ru(NCS)2(MeIm)2(PPh3)2].CH3OH MeIm=1-methylimidazole 46.91
[RuH(CO)(bzimpy)(PPh3)2]Cl∙CH3OH 42.35
[RuH(CO)(bzimpy)(PPh3)2]∙CH3OH bzimpy=2,6-bis-(benzimidazol-2-yl)-pyridine 42.57
[RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)2(pyrim-4-Ph)] pyrim-4-Ph=4-phenylpyrimidine 31.22
RuH(CO)(BimCOO)(PPh3)2] BimCOO=benzimidazolecarboxylate 40.30 (d, J = 26.5 Hz), 37.48 (d, J = 26.2 Hz).
RuH(CO)(MeImCOO)(PPh3)2]CH3OH 41.10 (d, J = 26.8 Hz), 37.28 (d, J = 26.6 Hz).
[RuH(CO)((4-OH)BPA)(PPh3)2].CH3OH.H2O (4-OH)BPA=5-(4-hydroxybenzoyl)pyrazine-2-carboxylic acid 43.83
[RuH(CO)((4-OH)BPAM)(PPh3)2].2CH3OH (4-OH)BPAM=5-(4-hydroxybenzoyl)pyrazine-2-carboxamide 44.86), 44.57
The signal depends on the other ligands.
For example: [RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(C5H4NCOO)], where C5H4NCOO = 2-pyridinecarboxylate the 31P NMR signal is at 31.61 ppm.
Similar value of 31.41 is observed for [RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(C9H6NO)], C9H6NO=8-quinolinol.
And:
[RuCl(CO)(PPh3)2(HBIm)], HBmI =2-(hydroxymethyl)benzimidazole 42.09 ppm
[RuH(CO)(PPh3)2(1,10-phen)]Cl.H2O.(CH3)2O 1,10-phenanthroline 46.15 ppm
[RuCl2(HBO)(PPh3)2] 29.41
[RuCl(CO)(HBO)(PPh3)2] 37.05 HBO=2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole
[RuHCl(CO(PPh3)2(H2NPhBIm)] H2NPhBIm= 2-aminophenylbenzimidazole 45.15
[RuH(N3)(CO)(PPh3)3] 40.11
[RuH(NCO)(CO)(PPh3)3] 40.48
[Ru(BIm-2-COO)2(PPh3)2].CH3OH.H2O BIm-2-COO=benzimidazolecarboxylate 48.50
[RuCl2(MeIm-2-COO)(PPh3)2] MeIm-2-COO=1-methyl-1H-imidazole-2-carboxylate 38.42, 30.42
[Ru(NCS)2(MeIm)2(PPh3)2].CH3OH MeIm=1-methylimidazole 46.91
[RuH(CO)(bzimpy)(PPh3)2]Cl∙CH3OH 42.35
[RuH(CO)(bzimpy)(PPh3)2]∙CH3OH bzimpy=2,6-bis-(benzimidazol-2-yl)-pyridine 42.57
[RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)2(pyrim-4-Ph)] pyrim-4-Ph=4-phenylpyrimidine 31.22
RuH(CO)(BimCOO)(PPh3)2] BimCOO=benzimidazolecarboxylate 40.30 (d, J = 26.5 Hz), 37.48 (d, J = 26.2 Hz).
RuH(CO)(MeImCOO)(PPh3)2]CH3OH 41.10 (d, J = 26.8 Hz), 37.28 (d, J = 26.6 Hz).
[RuH(CO)((4-OH)BPA)(PPh3)2].CH3OH.H2O (4-OH)BPA=5-(4-hydroxybenzoyl)pyrazine-2-carboxylic acid 43.83
[RuH(CO)((4-OH)BPAM)(PPh3)2].2CH3OH (4-OH)BPAM=5-(4-hydroxybenzoyl)pyrazine-2-carboxamide 44.86), 44.57
More
VOTE