Home >
Community >
Is there a safe catch-all adapter sequence for trimming?
Upvote
26
Downvote
+ Bioinformatics
+ Illumina
Posted by
Mohamed Abdelaleem
Is there a safe catch-all adapter sequence for trimming?
You're best off just using fastp or Trim Galore!, both of which will determine the adapter sequence for you. Trim Galore! uses a built-in list of known sequences for this, whereas fastp uses read overlap.
You're best off just using fastp or Trim Galore!, both of which will determine the adapter sequence for you. Trim Galore! uses a built-in list of known sequences for this, whereas fastp uses read overlap.
For clarity, are you suggesting it's better to switch over completely to this recommended set of tools, or are you simply introducing the possibility of using fastp to determine the adapters (or extract the list from trim galore)? One benefit of using MarkIlluminaAdapters is that it simply "marks" the sequences using More
for a conscientious bioinformatician to store reads in SAM (et al.) format at every stage (raw unaligned, QC'd, aligned, aligned post-processed, etc.) in a way that preserves the original raw sequence unambiguously. In practice though, it will be problematic since many tools are not designed with this paradigm in mind. It would take years to get everyone on the same page, if indeed it's even possible to do so.More
You're best off just using
fastporTrim Galore!, both of which will determine the adapter sequence for you. Trim Galore! uses a built-in list of known sequences for this, whereas fastp uses read overlap.You're best off just using
fastporTrim Galore!, both of which will determine the adapter sequence for you. Trim Galore! uses a built-in list of known sequences for this, whereas fastp uses read overlap.More
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE
VOTE