Allow switch from duty drawback scheme to IGST refund: Exporters
The Commerce Ministry has taken note of exporters’ complaints that the input duty refund under the duty drawback scheme claimed by some last year was much lower than the IGST (Integrated Goods & Services Tax) refunds due to them and it may ask the Finance Ministry to address the issue.

“Exporters have said that they are willing to pay back the drawback with interest and they should be instead given IGST refund, which is a much higher amount. The DGFT is likely to take up the matter with the Customs Department,” a government official said.
Last year, when the GST regime was implemented, exporters were given the option of continuing with the popular duty drawback scheme (at a higher rate for some items) for three months (July-September) if they agreed to forego refund of IGST paid by them. After a number of exporters opted for the duty drawback option, they discovered that the IGST paid by them on inputs was much higher and opting for refunds under IGST would have been a better deal.
‘Initial confusion’
“In the initial period everyone was confused about GST impact. A number of exporters were not aware of the implications and chose to be compensated for input taxes under the duty drawback scheme. Now when they understand that GST refund would give them a much higher amount for many items, the government should oblige,” said Mr. Ajay Sahai from the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO).
While the Finance Ministry has once refused to allow exporters to switch their stated preference, Commerce Ministry officials say that they will take up the issue again. “Exporters need to be compensated fully for the input taxes paid as it is vital to help them stay competitive in the global market,” they said.
2026-10-21
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
U.S.-Iran Détente Triggers Oil Price Plunge, Energy and Chemical Sectors Tumble
-
"Zipper-Like" Opening and Closing of Hormuz Coupled with Russian Export Ban Send Energy and Chemical Prices Soaring
-
Global Countries Impose Tariffs on Chinese Chemical Products
-
China Suspends Sulfuric Acid Exports, Global Copper and Fertilizer Supply Under Strain
-
AUTOMA Chem 2026: Powering Industry 4.0 in Chemistry
-
Chemical Raw Materials: How to Source Quality Suppliers & Understand Grades
-
Big adjustment! Basf quietly closed 11 factories in Germany and transferred to China for plant investment!
-
Fluorine chemical: profit generally declined, under the pressure to expand profit space
-
Chemical production in the 27 EU countries has continued to recover, and the market recovery is still cautious
-
China: The development of green agricultural is the trend, and the future focus is on innovation and quality
Recommend Reading
-
Beiersdorf Delivers 2025 Growth Despite Ongoing Market Pressure
-
Deméter Enters China with a Stress-Focused Pitch
-
Samsung Biologics Launches Formal Bid for PolyPeptide, Reshaping the Global Peptide API CDMO Map
-
Novo Nordisk Faces a Compliance Test
-
BioNTech’s Founders Turn the Page
-
India Unleashes a Triple-Action Defender: Parijat Introduces NILANIX SC into the Rice Battlefront
-
France’s Vineyards Find a New Shield: Eden’s Mevalone Enters the Frontline of a Changing Fungicide Era
-
Ammonium Sulfate Market Prices Show Weak Decline (10.8-10.15) in China
-
Mainstay Enterprises Reduce Load, PC Prices Rise in Early December in China
-
Business Society September 28, 2026 n-Butanol Trend Analysis: Bearish Oscillations