EU Evaluates the Safety of Sucrose Phosphorylase Produced by Genetically Modified E. coli Strain LE1B109-pPB129
On May 15, 2024, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) issued an opinion on the safety evaluation of a sucrose phosphorylase (EC 2.4.1.7) food enzyme. The enzyme is produced using the genetically modified Escherichia coli strain LE1B109-pPB129 by c-LEcta GmbH.
According to the EFSA assessment, the genetic modifications do not raise safety concerns. The food enzyme was found to be free from viable cells of the production organism. The enzyme is intended to be used in combination with a cellobiose phosphorylase in the production of the specialty carbohydrate cellobiose.
The EFSA panel concluded that while the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure cannot be excluded, the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the panel determined that this food enzyme does not raise safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
The EFSA evaluation highlights the rigorous safety assessment process for novel food enzymes, including those produced using genetically modified microorganisms. The findings suggest that the sucrose phosphorylase enzyme can be safely used in food applications, providing a useful tool for the production of specialty carbohydrates. This decision underscores the EU's commitment to ensuring the safety of food ingredients while promoting technological innovation in the sector.
2026-10-15
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
Hormuz Closes, Paint Feels It First: How a Barrel of Oil Rewrites the Cost of Every Barrel of Coatings
-
Titanium Dioxide Prices Are Up Again! This Round of Increases Has One Real Driver: Sulfuric Acid
-
Trump Tariff "Boomerang": $2.5 Billion Polysilicon Factory Faces Shutdown Crisis
-
Retinol in Cosmetics: Regulatory Tightening and Market Changes
-
This Is Not a Price Increase Wave but a Full-Blown Cost Squeeze Across China’s Coatings Chain
-
U.S. Strikes Three Iranian Tankers as “Tanker-for-Tanker” Escalation Raises Chemical Shipping Risk
-
Panama Canal Delays Deeper Draft Cut, but Transit Capacity Is Still Tightening
-
Middle East Conflict Pushes Up Oil Prices as More Than 100 Chemical Raw Materials Rise in Concentration
-
Redwall Raises Prices by as Much as 80%, Songwon Launches Global Increases, and Chemical Companies Are Collectively Passing On Costs
-
UAE Withdraws from OPEC
Recommend Reading
-
Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz to All Vessels: Global Chemical Trade Gets Choked
-
Shell Qatar GTL Unit Partially Restarts, Enters Spot Market
-
“Zero Tariff Is Not a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card”: Hainan’s Full Customs Closure—Boon or Trap for the Chemical Industry?
-
China’s Chemical “Spring Surge”: 68.8% of Products Rising—Real Recovery or Just a Pre-Festival Mirage?
-
“Did They Just Buy a Money Printer for ¥288 Million?”: Yip’s Chemical’s Bold Bet on Green Tech—Is This a Genuine Transformation or Just Another Story for the Stock Market?
-
Business Society’s PET Market Outlook on September 3, 2026: Rising
-
Geopolitical Risks in the Middle East Resurge & Hurricane Disrupts Supply; Oil Prices Surge 4%
-
Business Society’s Market Outlook for Phenol on September 4, 2026: Trending Stronger
-
Business Society October 9, 2026 Melamine Trend Analysis: Volatility
-
Business Society’s PET Market Outlook for September 4, 2026: Volatile with a Slight Bullish Bias