Pace of cancer drug reimbursement varies wildly across Europe
Researchers have found that some European countries take more than twice as long as others to reach health technology assessment (HTA) decisions about reimbursing cancer drugs following European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval.
The team looked at the new cancer drugs approved for solid tumours by the EMA between January 2007 and December 2017, which totalled 47 drugs for 77 indications. They then tracked the length of time from approval to HTA decisions in England, France, Germany and Scotland.
They found that the median from approval to reimbursement decision was two to three times longer in England and Scotland, compared to Germany and France.
The average length was 405 days for England, 384 days for Scotland, 209 days for Germany and 118 days for France.
Study co-author, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland senior research scientist at the, and affiliated researcher at Harvard Medical School Dr Kerstin Vokinger said: “Among other things, the different amount of resources invested in such assessments and different national regulations regarding HTA systems may lead to variation in the time from EMA approval to HTA decisions in different countries.”
The researchers also found that health authorities in all four countries generally made decisions more quickly about drugs ranked as of the highest benefit by the European Society of Medical Oncology’s (ESMO) Magnitude of Clinical Benefit (ESMO-MCBS), compared to those with less clinical benefit.
In France, the median time to HTA decision on highest benefit drugs was 154 days, compared to 198 for less benefit.
However, similar time variations, in which England and Scotland were significantly slower than Germany and France, existed for the so-called highest benefit drugs.
The median for highest benefit drugs was 302 days in England, compared to 203 days for Germany.
University Medical Centre Groningen medical oncologist and chair of the ESMO-MCBS Working Group Professor Elisabeth de Vries said: “It is reassuring that in the countries studied, anticancer drugs with greatest clinical benefit on ESMO-MCBS are associated with faster times to HTA decisions and nearly all are approved for reimbursement.”
In addition, the ESMO research found that in all four countries nearly all the highest benefit cancer drugs approved by the EMA passed the HTA reimbursement process. In Germany, this was the case 100% of the time, 95% in Scotland, 92% in England and 90% in France.
The institutions responsible for HTA decisions are the National Institute of Care Excellence (NICE) for England, the Scottish Medicines Consortium for Scotland, the National Authority for Health (HAS) for France and the Institute of Medical of Medical Documentation and Information’s Agency of Health Technology Assessment for Germany.
These findings will be presented at the ESMO’s 2018 Congress in Munich between 19 and 23 October.
The researchers are planning to expand their research and compare their findings with Southern and Eastern Europe.
2026-07-27
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
Clean Food Group Secures UK, EU, and US Approval for Fermentation-Derived Cosmetic Oils
-
Backed by Hanwha and DL, Still No Rescue? South Korea's Third-Largest Ethylene Giant on the Brink of Collapse
-
NOVA Chemicals Launches PE Resins with Next-Generation Non-Fluoropolymer Processing Aid
-
Global Chemical Exports Are Freezing in 2026
-
Sun Pharma’s Winning Formula: Precision Over Expansion
-
ExxonMobil “Hits the Brakes”: Industrial Fractures Under the EU’s Chemical Recycling Policy Reef
-
Solvay’s Zhenjiang Plant Expansion Goes Online, Doubling Electronic-Grade Hydrogen Peroxide Output to Support Semiconductor Advancements
-
Iran's Only MDI/TDI Plant Attacked, Middle East Supply Nearly Zero, Global Gap Widens
-
Keshun Enters Industrial Coatings: Waterproofing Leader Seeks Growth Beyond Real Estate
-
Why Did Chemical Raw Materials Unexpectedly Escape the Latest Round of U.S. 301 Tariffs on 60 Economies?
Recommend Reading
-
Jiangsu Fengshan Biochem Gears Up for Strategic Expansion in Selective Herbicide Intermediates and Active Ingredients
-
Afidopyropen: The Silent Assassin of Sap-Sucking Pests—Promise, Pitfalls, and the Path to Sustainable Deployment
-
Continental Tires Out, Franchise Power In: Continental Group Spins Off French Retail Arm to ASC in Strategic Pivot
-
Sulfur Price Hits 7,633 CNY/Ton, Up Nearly Sixfold in a Year and a Half; Domestic Refining Giants Halt New Orders Due to Tight Supply
-
Middle East Conflict Pushes Up Oil Prices as More Than 100 Chemical Raw Materials Rise in Concentration
-
Cost Advantages Support, Polyester Staple Fiber Prices Remain on an Upward Trend
-
This Week's Styrene Market Weakens and Falls (12.15-12.19)
-
Today, PET polyester bottle flakes rebound strongly (12.19)
-
Premium Global Chemical Sourcing Requests (28-31May, 2026)
-
What is a Surfactant? (Definition, Types, and How They Work)
- Hot Searches
- propylene oxide
- dinitrogen pentoxide formula
- magnesium pyrophosphate formula
- pyrazine
- ethanol solution msds
- chloromethane
- hydrogen sulfide chemical formula
- petroleum ether structure
- chemical formula glycerol
- tetrakis hydroxymethyl phosphonium sulfate
- enterobacter cloacae
- dimethyl sulfone