Australia Will Finally Ban Cosmetic Testing on Animals
Last week, a bill was put before the House of Representatives that would ban animal testing of industrial chemicals intended solely for use in cosmetics.
The proposed bill would affect a wide variety of products: “cosmetics” are legally defined as any substance used on the body, or in the mouth to change its appearance, cleanse it, perfume it or protect it. This includes soaps, shampoos, moisturiser, hair dye, perfumes and deodorants.
It’s difficult to know exactly how many animals will be affected by this ban, as companies do not advertise their use of animal testing and results are often unpublished. It’s likely to be relatively small, but this ban will both improve their lives and be an important international signal.
Cosmetic testing commonly measures the reaction of animals’ skin, eyes and respiratory tracts to high concentrations of certain chemicals. Other tests determine a product’s potential to cause foetal abnormalities, cancer or genetic mutations.
The global move away from animal testing
As a practice, it has had a turbulent history. It’s increasingly opposed by the public but many governments – including Australia’s – require animal tests to be conducted for some potentially hazardous new cosmetic ingredients.
Most prominent in this arena is the European Union. After animal testing was first banned in Germany in 1986, it was extended to the entire Union in 2004. In 2009 the ban was expanded to include ingredients, not just the finished product. Then imports came under scrutiny, as Japan and the United States are major exporters to the EU, and imports of cosmetic products tested on animals were banned in 2013.
Since that time Israel, India, Norway, New Zealand, South Korea, Turkey, Taiwan and parts of Brazil have all banned testing of cosmetics on animals. However, the Humane Society International estimates that globally around 100,000-200,000 animals are still used annually for this purpose.
The US is considering a ban, which would drastically diminish the market for any manufacturers still using animal testing. Until recently China required all cosmetics to be tested on animals, although this requirement has [now been relaxed for non-specialised cosmetics such as hair, skin and nail care products, perfumes and make-up.
Looking for chemical products? Let suppliers reach out to you!
Chemicals in Personal Care Products
2026-06-24
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
in-cosmetics Global launches the first Nutricosmetics Ingredient Index
-
in-cosmetics Global reveals line-up for 2026 programme curated for innovation
-
IN-COSMETICS GLOBAL TO LAUNCH FIRST DEDICATED INNER BEAUTY ZONE FOR NUTRICOSMETIC INNOVATIONS IN 2026
-
COSMOPROF WORLDWIDE BOLOGNA 2026: A GLOBAL BEAUTY ECOSYSTEM IN CONTINUOUS EVOLUTION
-
French Cosmetics Exports Poised for First Drop in Over Two Decades in 2025
-
Cocamidopropyl Betaine: Uses, Benefits, and Safety
-
Pierre Fabre established a new cosmetics innovation center in Shanghai, China
-
COSME Tokyo International Cosmetics Trade Fair 2024
-
Beauty Expo Australia 2023
-
COSMOPROF WORLDWIDE BOLOGNA 2024
Recommend Reading
-
Rising Naphtha Prices in Japan Drive Up Costs for Diapers, Sanitary Products, and Cosmetics
-
BASF Builds New Alkyl Polyglucoside Plant in Thailand, Expands Its Business Footprint in Asia
-
L Catterton to Acquire Minority Stake in Perfume Company EX NIHILO
-
Procter & Gamble Exits Pakistan Amid Economic Pressures, Ending Three Decades of Operations
-
Safic-Alcan Acquires Anders, Expanding Latin American Presence
-
FDA’s Warning to Compounders Raises the Stakes for API and Excipient Suppliers
-
Demand Fails to Expand, ABS Struggles Through Golden September
-
BASF’s Price Increase Shows Pharma Excipients Are Still Exposed to Chemical Cost Pressure
-
Limited Positive Factors Drive Downward Trend in Shandong Butanol Prices in Early September
-
Demand Release Fails to Meet Expectations, PP "Golden September" Goes Against the Market Trend