New Zealand Food Policies Need to Change to Tackle Obesity
New Zealand Food Policies Need to Change to Tackle Obesity
New Zealand's food policies need major improvement in order to see any change to the country's obesity epidemic, a new report says.
The second Auckland University Health Food Environment Policy Index, published today, saw the country score poorly on about half of the food policy indicators used to measure the policy changes needed to tackle the problem.
The 2017 report asked a panel of 71 independent and government public health experts to rate the extent of implementation of Government policies on food environments and infrastructure against international best practice. The first version was published in 2014.
Forty-seven per cent of all the good practice indicators were rated as having "low" or "very little, if any" implementation.
It was a slight improvement on 2014 when 60 per cent of indicators received one of the bottom two ratings, but there was still a long way to go, said co-author of the report Professor Boyd Swinburn.
"If you look at the outcomes, which are the obesity rates, we're doing very poorly," he said.
New Zealand adults and children had the third highest rate of being overweight or obese within the OECD and Kiwi adults were on track to take out the top spot within three or four years, he said.
In 2015/2016, 32 per cent of adults were obese, up from 27 per cent in 2006/07, and one in nine children aged 2-14 years were obese.
Swinburn said the panel scored food labelling policies well while several other areas improved their scores.
Major implementation gaps were identified for healthy food policies in schools, fiscal policies to support healthy food choices, implementing restrictions on unhealthy food marketing to children, supporting communities to limit the density of unhealthy food outlets, supporting the food retail and service industry to reduce unhealthy food practices and ensuring that trade and investment agreements did not negatively affect population health.
The panel made 53 recommendations but identified nine for immediate action.
The top two recommendations were to strengthen the Childhood Obesity Plan and set targets for reducing the number of overweight or obese children from a third to a quarter by 2025, reducing the average intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat and voluntary reformulation of ingredients in key foods.
"There was a pretty strong consensus from around the country that the childhood obesity plan is very weak and needs to be substantially bolstered. We can't be expected to support children with such a weak plan," Swinburn said. "The plan is just a referral of obese kids to primary care."
Swinburn said he believed reducing the childhood obesity rate was do-able if the Government got serious about it and committed to making the changes other countries had already made.
Health Minister Dr Jonathan Coleman agreed obesity was a serious issue which was "threatening the health of young New Zealanders".
"Obesity is particularly concerning in children as it is associated with a wide range of health conditions, it can also affect a child's overall quality of life. There's no single solution that will fix obesity. That's why we've implemented a Childhood Obesity Plan with a range of interventions across Government, the private sector, communities, schools and families. We're now one of the few OECD countries to have a target and comprehensive plan on childhood obesity."
Labour health spokesman David Clark said obesity was a major issue and National's "head in the sand" approach was not good enough.
He said Labour supported having real targets for obesity reduction rather than referral targets and would be held accountable for reaching them.
Labour would support most of the top nine recommendations, he said. They would increase prevention funding, but could not say how much, and would consider a sugar-tax if they could not work with industry to agree on voluntary reductions over time.
Looking for chemical products? Let suppliers reach out to you!
2026-07-17
-
Functional Ingredients Industry Overview
Collection of Markets for Functional Ingredients in Food & Nutrition and Cosmetics.Published in: Mar. 2026
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
Thailand issues GMO food labeling rules
-
ECHEMI平台投诉处罚规则 - ECHEMI platform complaint penalty rules
-
All You Concerned about Silicon Dioxide in Food: Is It Harmful to Us?
-
What is chemicals used in food processing industry? Know more
-
Ministry of Industry and InformationTechnology: 14 initiatives to help SMEs digital transformation
-
Jiangsu: Special graphite new material production project landed in Suyin Industrial Park
-
Guide to digital transformation of smalland medium-sized enterprises issued
-
Henan Province issued chemical parkconstruction standards and identified management methods
-
German丨Minister of Agriculture confirms plans to ban pesticide exports
-
EU丨Commission adopts new rules to fastrack approval of biological pesticides
Recommend Reading
-
FDA Moves to Revoke 52 Outdated Food Standards Major Changes for Dairy, Canned Goods and Baked Products
-
Trump Raises Brazil Import Tariffs to 50 Percent $229 Million Seafood Trade in Jeopardy
-
EFSA Confirms Acacia Gum Safe in Animal Feed Up to 4889 mg/kg User Sensitization Risk Highlighted
-
Trump Sets 19 Percent Tariff on All Indonesian Exports to US $1.9 Billion Seafood Trade Faces Uncertainty
-
Canada’s Seafood Exports Escape Trump’s 35 Percent Tariff USMCA Exemption Protects Salmon and Lobster Trade
-
2025 Crude Oil Market Prices Decline—Can 2026 Bring a Turning Point?
-
U.S. FDA Opens New Safety Review of RSV Treatments for Infants
-
Minoxidil Safety Under Global Review as Infant Exposure Risks Surface
-
Uses and Properties of Copper Acetate
-
Zydus Brings the First Keytruda Biosimilar Showdown to North America