Veylinx Study Reveals Increasing Demand for Multi-Purpose Sunscreens
A new study from leading behavioral research firm Veylinx reveals consumer SPF preferences, emerging skincare trends, and how much consumers are willing to pay for sunscreen—a behavior driven by a growing fear of sun exposure.
Veylinx surveyed consumers on their preferences and willingness to pay for basic versus enhanced versions of popular sunscreen brands.
The findings highlight growing consumer awareness of sunscreen benefits and a growing demand for sunscreen products that go beyond basic UV protection. Demand for products with anti-aging benefits grew 49%, followed by moisturizers up 33%, and products containing vitamin C up 23%.
The study shows that 38% of people never feel completely at ease in the sun, 60% report burning easily, and 41% worry about skin damage. 30% of respondents apply sunscreen every day during the summer, while another 21% apply five to six times a week, while only 27% use sunscreen year-round. 65% of consumers prefer sunscreens with an SPF of 40 or higher.
The study also compared brands, with the overall ranking showing Neutrogena at the top with 41%, followed by Cerave 38%, Coppertone 35%, Olay 33%, Supergoop 17%, and Target's Up & Up brand 14%.
Supergoop, which has moisturizing properties, has the highest price, while Supergoop, Cerave, and Olay's anti-aging products have seen the largest increase in demand over basic versions.
Notably, 27% of consumers choose reef-safe sunscreens, and consumers interested in these products are willing to pay 14% more, making "reef-safe" a potential important revenue driver for brands. While this suggests consumers are more concerned about ocean protection, only 16% choose to use sustainable packaging.
2026-07-27
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
The End of Hype: Europe’s Bio-stimulant Industry Faces a Science-First Reckoning by 2030
-
Japan Tightens the Rules—Then Loosens Them: A Surprising Shift in Food Additive Policy
-
FDA Orders Removal of “Suicidality Warning”: Are Weight-Loss Blockbusters Finally Cleared—or Is Regulators Giving the Market a Reality Check?
-
WACKER’s 2025 Loss Reaches €805 Million as the PACE Cost-Cutting Plan Becomes the Key Variable for 2026
-
MENA Pharmaceutical Regulatory Updates 2026: Key Compliance Changes for Global Pharma Companies
-
FDA Dye Pledges Push Natural Colors Into the Mainstream
-
FDA Fee Updates Raise the Cost of Entering the U.S. Generic Drug Chain
-
Sudden Turmoil in Middle East Shipping Routes: Multiple Carriers Announce Emergency Navigation and Surcharge Policies
-
Your Plant Has the Data. Your AI Cannot Reach It. Here Is Why That Is the Core Problem in Chemical Manufacturing.
-
EU Biocidal Data Protection Extension Raises the Stakes for Chemical Market Entry
Recommend Reading
-
EFSA Reviews Clodinafop Risk
-
FDA Sharpens the Dietary Supplement Ingredient Debate
-
FDA and NIH Launch a New Nutrition Science Partnership
-
FDA Reopens the Raw Manure Debate
-
“全球展会数据”功能上线公告 Announcement on the Launch of the “Global Exhibition Data” Function
-
Silver Nitrate: Medical Uses, Photography History, and Staining Properties
-
Sodium Metabisulfite: Properties, Uses, and Safety
-
Phosphoric Acid: Uses in Cola, Rust Removal, and Fertilizers Explained
-
Costs Rise, January PP Follows Upstream Prices
-
Raw Material Strength and Weak Demand Lead to PC Fluctuations in January in China