China Is Eyeballing A Major Strategic Investment In Saudi Arabia's Oil
Since the election of Donald Trump, relations between Saudi Arabia and the United States have seemingly returned to their halcyon days. Saudi officials have been energized by Trump's desire to roll back influence and his support for Saudi economic reforms, and they are enthusiastic about the two countries' newfound unity of purpose.
But Saudi Arabia is not just being courted by the Trump administration. Without the pomp and circumstance of the Riyadh summit, where Trump addressed representatives from across the Muslim world earlier this year, the Chinese government is taking quiet steps to bring Saudi Arabia's hydrocarbon reserves firmly into its orbit.
Through its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative and a reported offer to invest in the kingdom's state-owned oil company, Saudi Aramco, the Chinese are laying the groundwork for a profound economic shift in the Middle East and the world.
As it has grown over the last three decades, China has slowly become a much more important energy partner to Saudi Arabia and Gulf states. Its emergence as an economic powerhouse has increasingly fueled its ambition to dictate the rules of the energy market: In recent years, it has scaled down its share of energy imports from OPEC members in favor of non-OPEC countries, primarily due to its preference to purchase oil and gas in yuan or the local currency of the exporter, rather than U.S. dollars. China imports approximately one-quarter of its energy from Saudi Arabia, but Russia recently supplanted the kingdom as China's top energy producer.
China's fastidious control over its own currency is the first step toward upending the way oil is traded. Forged by President Richard Nixon and Saudi King Faisal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud in 1973, the petrodollar system has wedded the greenback to the world's most sought-after commodity.
In return for conducting energy sales exclusively in dollars, the United States agreed to sell Saudi Arabia advanced military equipment. One obvious reason China wants oil to be traded in yuan is to increase global demand for yuan-denominated assets. This would increase capital inflows and may eventually lead to the yuan being a plausible global alternative to the American dollar. Saudi Arabia is OPEC's historic swing producer and price arbiter - if it agreed to conduct transactions in currencies other than the dollar, other OPEC producers would be forced to follow suit.
Beijing's thinking is also influenced by geopolitical calculations. China's return on investment in Saudi infrastructure could take decades, but Beijing would gain a valuable foothold in the Gulf and possibly persuade one of the world's leading oil producers to upend the way oil is traded. Moreover, Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies, especially the United Arab Emirates, provide a valuable hub to Middle Eastern and African markets through their ports, airports, and global networks. This spring and summer, Beijing and Riyadh announced a number of deals in various sectors, including increased energy exports and a reported $20 billion shared investment fund.
The equation is much more difficult for Saudi Arabia and the other oil-producing countries in the Gulf. On one hand, Saudi Arabia's alliance with the United States, however shaky, is the bedrock of regional security. On the other hand, growth in energy consumption will continue to be centered east of the kingdom, not west.
The Chinese have not given Saudi Arabia much time to consider its options. Chinese state-owned oil companies PetroChina and Sinopec have already expressed interest in a direct purchase of 5 per cent of Saudi Aramco. This could prove to be a boon for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has been eager to achieve a $2 trillion valuation of Aramco in a highly anticipated initial public offering, which is currently scheduled for 2018.
Considering the depressed state of the oil market, investors may be hesitant to meet the targets for Aramco's valuation that the Saudi leadership has laid out. A private Chinese placement could solve this dilemma - and allow Riyadh to delay the IPO in the hopes that oil prices will improve. While this investment may not explicitly require that Saudi Arabia agree to trade in yuan, it would give China leverage toward that goal. For Mohammed bin Salman, Chinese investment in Aramco could kick-start a new economic partnership with Beijing. As part of its economic reform, Saudi Arabia's ambitious Vision 2030 plan intends to raise foreign direct investment from 3.8 percent of GDP to 5.7 percent, or an additional $12 billion per year.
It is a far safer bet that China would be able and willing to inject that type of money into Saudi Arabia than U.S. private equity and hedge funds. The main reason for this is the difference in Chinese and Western time horizons when considering return on investment. While Western governments and companies have historically had appetite for infrastructure projects that offer a return on investment in a maximum of 30 to 40 years, the Chinese are playing a much longer game - in some cases investing in projects that break even in more than 100 years.
Saudi Arabia and China stand to gain from this geoeconomic shift - but what about the United States? For all its talk of remaking the U.S. economy, the Trump administration must heed the changing economic currents. Given the depths of Beijing's interest in Saudi Aramco, it seems many policymakers in the Gulf and the West do not fully appreciate the geopolitical interests at stake. Aramco, formerly the Arabian-American Oil Company, will not rebrand itself - but it may effectively become "Archco," the Arabian-Chinese Oil Company.
Asked how he went bankrupt, a character in Ernest Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises responded: "Two ways. Gradually and then suddenly." It's unlikely the petrodollar system will be fully replaced by an equivalent "petroyuan" system, but the dollar's monopoly on major oil sales may loosen gradually - and then suddenly. That gradual process may have already begun.
Looking for chemical products? Let suppliers reach out to you!
2026-07-09
-
Fine Chemicals Industry Overview Dec.2025
Insight into Structural Shifts, Capturing Long-Term Value in Fine Chemicals. Available for Permanent Download.Published in: Jan. 2026
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
South Korea Initiates Anti-Dumping Probe on Chinese PVC Suspension Resin, Involving Tianjin Bohua and Wanhua Chemical
-
China Keeps Registering Pesticides
-
India Launches Anti-Dumping Probe into PET Film from China, Singapore, Thailand and the UAE
-
INEOS Warns Chinese Chemical “Dumping” Is Hitting Europe’s Industry
-
Covestro Builds New 660,000-ton MDI Plant in China: Global Supply Gap Meets Chinese Overcapacity Head-On
-
India Imposes Final Anti‑Dumping Duties on Ethylenediamine from China, EU, Saudi Arabia, and Taiwan, China, with Top Rate of $575/tonne
-
EU Finalizes Anti-Dumping Duties on BDO from China, with Rates up to 113.7%
-
EU mulls expanding tariff scope on Chinese chemicals, sector-wide measures in the pipeline
-
Global Countries Impose Tariffs on Chinese Chemical Products
-
China Suspends Sulfuric Acid Exports, Global Copper and Fertilizer Supply Under Strain
Recommend Reading
-
Huide Technology Partners with U.S. Firm to Open the Door to Mass Production of Circular TPU
-
Forced to "cut"! South Korean Petrochemical Giants Forced to Cut Production by 25%
-
BASF to Shut Down Hydrosulfites Production in Ludwigshafen
-
Avril Group to Acquire Champlor Renewables from Valtris
-
SIBUR Develops New Polypropylene for Retort Packaging
-
“Hidden Champion” Swallowed Whole: PPG’s Acquisition of EMM Isn’t Just About Three Brands—It’s a Grab for the Next Decade’s Coating Authority
-
BASF and CATL Sign Strategic Pact for Advanced Cathode Materials 60000 Tons High-Nickel Output by 2025
-
A $25 Billion Bill Hits Global Companies as Chemical Costs Are Repriced
-
From Scale Expansion to Technology Premium: The Shifting Landscape of the Acrylic Market 2025-2026
-
“Amputate to Survive, or Bleed to Feed the Vultures?”: Dow’s 4,500 Layoffs Reveal the Life-or-Death Battle in Global Chemicals