Federal Judge Rejects Cancer Victims' Bid to Block Johnson & Johnson Bankruptcy
On this past Friday, Federal Judge Michael Shipp carefully evaluated a request from a group of cancer victims to block Johnson & Johnson's bankruptcy plans, and ultimately rejected their motion. This decision paves the way for a more convenient bankruptcy resolution to handle tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging the company's talcum powder products contained cancer-causing asbestos.
Previously, on June 11th, the cancer victims had filed a preliminary injunction in New Jersey, seeking to prevent Johnson & Johnson from filing for bankruptcy outside of the state, in an effort to salvage a $6.48 billion settlement plan. This motion was part of the plaintiffs' lawyers' class action lawsuit against the settlement plan.
However, Judge Michael Shipp stated on Friday that he could not approve the motion, as the victims' injuries were "purely hypothetical." He emphasized that he lacked jurisdiction to resolve disputes arising from "events that have not occurred and may never occur."
As of late last Friday, the plaintiffs' lawyers had not immediately responded to requests for comment.
As part of the prepackaged bankruptcy plan, Johnson & Johnson is hoping to secure at least 75% support from claimants. The voting deadline for the plan is set for July 26th.
The healthcare conglomerate currently faces over 61,000 lawsuits from plaintiffs alleging their talcum powder products caused ovarian cancer or mesothelioma, a fatal cancer linked to asbestos exposure.
Johnson & Johnson maintains the safety of its talcum powder products, stating they do not contain asbestos and are not carcinogenic. The company argues the bankruptcy settlement will provide fair and equitable compensation to plaintiffs, avoiding the common inequities in the civil justice system where some plaintiffs receive no compensation while others receive vast sums.
Lawyers opposing the plan argue it is an attempt to defraud plaintiffs of the billions of dollars in company assets they are owed in rightful compensation.
Johnson & Johnson has previously attempted to execute bankruptcy strategies twice to resolve current and future talcum powder litigation, in a tactic known as the "Texas Two-Step." This involves creating a subsidiary to take on Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder liabilities, then having that subsidiary file for bankruptcy to resolve the cases. However, two courts have found Johnson & Johnson's subsidiaries lacked the necessary "financial distress" to legitimize the bankruptcy filings.
The company's plan focuses on resolving bankruptcy claims from women with ovarian cancer and other gynecological cancers allegedly linked to talcum powder. In addition to the bankruptcy plan, Johnson & Johnson has settled most mesothelioma cases and reached a separate $700 million agreement this month to resolve claims brought by state attorneys general.
Looking for chemical products? Let suppliers reach out to you!
2026-07-23
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
Givaudan to Build New Fragrance Compounding Facility in Pedro Escobedo, Mexico
-
Clariant and FUHUA Establish Joint Venture to Co-Develop Halogen-Free Flame Retardants
-
Korea’s Antitrust Probe Targets Coatings Price Hikes as Five Major Players Come Under Investigation
-
India Removes Import Tax on 40 Petrochemical Products
-
Brenntag Partners with Givaudan to Supply Active Cosmetic Ingredients and Raw Materials to Thailand
-
China Is Finally Moving on Petrochemical Plants, and This Time Low-Efficiency Capacity Really Is Being Forced Out
-
South Korea Initiates Anti-Dumping Probe on Chinese PVC Suspension Resin, Involving Tianjin Bohua and Wanhua Chemical
-
BASF to Build Ammonium Hydroxide Plant in Ludwigshafen, Strengthening Its Electronic-Grade Chemicals Supply Network
-
Evonik Restructures Strategic R&D and Aims to Move Projects into Application Within Five Years
-
Saudi Arabia Flips the Switch on Jafurah: World’s Largest Non-U.S. Shale Gas Field Begins Production
Recommend Reading
-
Advent Drops Its 2026 Purchase, and LANXESS’s €1.2 Billion Exit Plan Falls Through
-
Procter & Gamble Posts Higher Profits on Strong Personal Care Sales and Recovery in China
-
Fracturing the Crown: BASF Antwerp’s 600-Job Cut and the Global Alarm
-
Novo Nordisk Reports Theft of Six Drug Batches in India Authorities Warn of Severe Patient Safety Risks
-
Wanhua’s Counter-Cyclical Expansion: A Gamble or a Strategic Move for the Next Cycle?
-
Favorable Factors Boost Shandong Cyclohexanone Market Prices by Over 30% in March
-
Supply Disruptions Repeatedly Resonate, Lithium Carbonate Experiences Sharp Fluctuations
-
Strong Cost Support Drives Robust Rise in Anhydrous Hydrogen Fluoride Market
-
Sulfate Ammonium Prices Continue to Rise in China Over the Past Ten Days (3.7-3.17)
-
Oxalic Acid: Acidity (pKa), Sources, and Kidney Stone Risk