EU Imposes Import Tariffs on Certain Types of Rice with Shells Starting March 7, 2024
The European Union (EU) has recently announced the implementation of import tariffs on specific varieties of rice with shells, effective from March 7, 2024. This move, as reported by the EU Commission, aims to regulate the importation of certain types of rice and protect the interests of the EU rice industry. The newly introduced tariffs will have significant implications for international trade and the global rice market.
On March 7, 2024, the EU Commission issued Regulation (EU) 2024/840, which outlines the details of the import tariffs on rice with shells. The regulation specifies the following key points:
1. Tariff Application: The import tariff applies to rice with shells falling under CN code 100620, excluding Basmati rice with shells as described in Article 2(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2835.
2. Tariff Rate: The import tariff rate for rice with shells falling under CN code 100620 (excluding Basmati rice) is set at €30 per metric ton.
3. Repeal of Previous Regulation: Regulation (EU) 2023/1701 is repealed by the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2024/840.
The regulation came into effect on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It is binding and directly applicable to all EU member states.
This decision to impose import tariffs on certain types of rice with shells is a strategic measure by the EU to protect its domestic rice industry. The tariffs aim to address concerns related to unfair competition and safeguard the interests of European rice farmers and producers. By imposing these tariffs, the EU seeks to create a level playing field for its rice industry while ensuring the availability of high-quality rice products to consumers within the EU.
The implications of the new import tariffs extend beyond the EU borders. Rice-exporting countries, especially those affected by the tariffs, will experience shifts in trade patterns and market dynamics. Exporters of rice with shells to the EU will need to adjust their pricing strategies and explore alternative markets to mitigate the impact of the tariffs. Additionally, importers and distributors within the EU will face changing supply chains and may need to seek alternative sources of rice to meet consumer demand.
It is important for stakeholders in the rice industry, including producers, exporters, importers, and consumers, to closely monitor the developments and adapt their business strategies accordingly. Market adjustments and potential trade negotiations may be necessary to accommodate the new import tariff regime and maintain a sustainable rice trade between the EU and its trading partners.
The EU's decision to impose import tariffs on certain types of rice with shells starting from March 7, 2024, marks a significant development in the global rice trade landscape. The tariffs are intended to protect the interests of the EU rice industry and create a fair trading environment. As the implementation progresses, stakeholders across the rice supply chain must navigate the evolving market dynamics and explore opportunities for trade optimization and collaboration to ensure the continued availability of rice products to consumers while adapting to the new tariff regime.
2026-08-26
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
Kraton Announces Strategic Plan to Streamline Polymer Operations in Berre, France
-
Air Liquide to Acquire Korea’s DIG Airgas for €2.85 Billion
-
UAE Breaks Ground on World’s First Gigascale Round-the-Clock Renewable Energy Project, Setting a New Global Standard For Clean Energy
-
Chemours Sells Its Former Titanium Dioxide Site in Taiwan: Turning a “White Powder” Factory into “Wind Power Real Estate” for $360 Million—Buying Not Cash, But Breathing Room
-
The “Counter-Wind Ledger” of CHF 11.2 Billion: Sika Barely Grew in 2025—Yet Kept Taking Market Share
-
European Petrochemicals Enter 'Era of Downsizing' as Dow, TotalEnergies, Shell Exit Older Cracker Assets
-
Spice Up the Coop: EFSA Reaffirms Safety of Botanical Blend for Broiler Feed—With a Warning for Handlers
-
Probiotic Promise, Safety Snag: EFSA Gives Mixed Verdict on Multi-Strain Dog Feed Additive
-
From Ancient Volcanoes to Modern Feed Mills: EFSA Validates Volcanic Zeolite as Safe and Effective Feed Additive
-
COIM Group Expands Alkyd and Acrylic Resin Production Capacity in the Netherlands
Recommend Reading
-
EU Alerts on Non-Compliant Chinese Oyster Sauce and Miso Exports
-
Syngenta’s VIRESTINA Targets Resistant Weeds as Herbicide Innovation Regains Urgency
-
Jell-O Simply Shows Clean Label Reformulation Has Entered Legacy Brands
-
New York’s Food Chemical Disclosure Bill Raises the Bar for GRAS Transparency
-
Dietary Supplement Listing Debate Puts Nutrition Ingredients Under a Brighter Spotlight
-
FDA’s Warning to Compounders Raises the Stakes for API and Excipient Suppliers
-
Limited Positive Factors Drive Downward Trend in Shandong Butanol Prices in Early September
-
Early September Acetic Acid Market Remains Strong
-
Chinese Hydrofluoric Acid Market Shows a Steady and Slightly Strong Trend
-
Premium Global Chemical Sourcing Requests (6-11 Sep 2025)