China Imposes 25% Tariff on Canadian Seafood in Response to Discriminatory Measures
On March 8, 2025, the Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council announced a significant retaliatory measure against Canada's discriminatory tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and metal products. Effective from March 20, 2025, a 25% tariff will be imposed on all seafood products originating from Canada.
This countermeasure is in strict accordance with the Foreign Trade Law and the Customs Law of the People's Republic of China, serving as a necessary response to Canada's unilateral protectionist actions. According to the Ministry of Commerce, Canada began imposing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and steel-aluminum products starting in October 2024, which constitutes a "discriminatory restriction" as defined by Chinese law.
The investigation confirmed that these Canadian restrictions have severely disrupted normal trade relations between China and Canada, harming the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises. As a result, China has decided to implement equivalent retaliation against Canadian seafood exports.
The newly imposed tariffs will cover all categories of seafood under customs code 03, including key export products such as lobster, snow crab, and Arctic shrimp. Importers will be required to pay an additional 25% tariff on top of the existing applicable rates, calculated as follows: additional tariff amount = tariff assessment price × 25%. Existing tax exemption policies will remain unchanged, but the new tariff will not be eligible for exemptions.
As the largest seafood consumer globally, China's tariff adjustment is set to directly impact Canada's seafood export landscape. International trade data indicates that Canada exports approximately $1.25 billion worth of seafood to China annually, accounting for 21% of its total seafood exports. If Canada fails to consult through the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute resolution mechanism before the measures take effect, its seafood exporters may face significant market share losses.
The Ministry of Commerce has reiterated that China maintains an open attitude. If the Canadian government rescinds its discriminatory measures or resolves trade disputes through compensation or consultation, China will adjust or lift the tariffs as appropriate. The future direction of China-Canada economic relations now hinges on Canada’s ability to correct its erroneous practices and adhere to multilateral trade rules.
Looking for chemical products? Let suppliers reach out to you!
2026-07-21
-
Functional Ingredients Industry Overview
Collection of Markets for Functional Ingredients in Food & Nutrition and Cosmetics.Published in: Mar. 2026
Trade Alert
Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.
(We'll never share your email address with a third-party.)
Related News
-
ANVISA Updates Additive Rules
-
Laboratoire PYC showcases its collagen-driven nutricosmetic innovations
-
Aldi Expands Its Ingredient Ban
-
FDA’s Review of BHT and ADA Signals a New Era for Food Additive Compliance
-
FDA Tracks Industry Dye Removal
-
EFSA Evaluates Extended Use of Pasteurised Akkermansia muciniphila as a Novel Food
-
Brazil Confirms 32 Methanol Poisoning Cases Linked to Contaminated Alcoholic Beverages
-
FDA Dye Phase-Out Push Opens a Bigger Window for Natural Color Solutions
-
EFSA Unable to Confirm Safety of Fusarium flavolapis Fungal Protein as a Novel Food
-
EFSA Confirms Safety of β-Amylase Produced from Barley for Food Manufacturing Use
Recommend Reading
-
Middle East Conflict Hits China Seafood Trade
-
Hormuz Closure Raises Cold-Chain Risk
-
US Tariff Refunds Could Reshape Seafood Trade
-
FDA Dye Tracker Raises Reformulation Pressure Across Food Brands
-
Snack Tests Put Red 40, Titanium Dioxide and BHT Back Under Pressure
-
MTBE Market Prices Continue to Decline
-
MDI Price Surge Hits EMEAI: Is This a Market Correction or the Beginning of a Supply Crisis?
-
Hormuz Closure Raises Cold-Chain Risk
-
Crude oil prices fall, retail prices of refined oil products in China continue to decrease
-
“Deregulation” or “Concession”? The Hidden Crisis Behind India’s Repeal of QCOs on Seven Key Petrochemicals