In 2019, the overall land market of 300 cities in China will be stable

In 2019, the land supply of 300 cities in China increased slightly year on year, the supply of first tier and second tier cities increased, and the supply and demand of third tier and fourth tier cities declined year on year. The overall average floor price and the collection of gold rose year on year, the average premium rate was basically the same, and the effect of the regulation policy of "stabilizing the word" was obvious. Recently, according to the data released by China Index Research Institute, in 2019, a total of 31116 plots of land were launched in 300 cities nationwide, an increase of 2% year-on-year; the land area was 1298.16 million square meters, an increase of 1% year-on-year for coating online coating.com. Among them, there are 10992 residential land (including residential land and comprehensive land including residential land, the same below), an increase of 6% year-on-year, and 534.17 million square meters of land launched, an increase of 5% year-on-year. In terms of transaction, there were 25899 transactions of land in 300 cities, a year-on-year decrease of 1%; the transaction area was 1065.68 million square meters, a year-on-year decrease of 1%. Among them, there are 8799 residential land, an increase of 6% year-on-year, and the transaction area of 425570000 square meters, an increase of 7% year-on-year.

In terms of land transaction price, the average annual transaction floor price of 300 cities is 2507 yuan / m2, an increase of 17% year on year. The average floor price of residential land was 4363 yuan / m2, an increase of 16% year on year. In 2019, the real estate regulation and control policy became stricter as a whole, and the land market premium rate remained stable. The annual average land premium rate of 300 cities in China was 13%, down 0.02 percentage points from 2018. The average premium rate of residential land is 15%, down 0.23% year on year. From the perspective of the whole market in 2019, in the first quarter, the supply and demand of the national land market fell year-on-year, the income of the transfer fee and the average price of the land both shrank, the hot cities insisted on regulation and control, and the land auction became cold; in the second quarter, the market recovered briefly, and the transfer fee of the land increased by more than half year-on-year; after entering the third quarter, the land market maintained a relatively low trend. In terms of cities, in 2019, the land supply and demand of first tier cities increased year on year, the total amount of transfer fees increased, and the average price fell. Among them, the total amount of land collection in Shenzhen increased by more than half year on year. The land auction policy of the second tier cities has been continuously improved. The land supply and transaction area have increased compared with 2018. The collection and average price have increased year on year, the premium rate has changed little, and the overall land market has remained stable.

In the third and fourth tier cities, the area of land supply has shrunk year on year, and the demand of hot cities has overflowed; in terms of transaction volume, the price has declined and the premium rate has declined by two percentage points. According to the analysis of China Academy of technology, in 2019, key cities will continue to increase the supply of rental housing, shared property housing, and guarantee the supply of housing land, so as to ensure the supply of just needed housing land. "In 2020, the introduction of talent housing land and indemnificatory housing land will continue to maintain a certain proportion. In particular, the Ministry of housing and urban rural development proposes to focus on the development of policy rental housing in 2020, and explore the standard and operation mechanism of policy rental housing. Affected by this, the supply of rental land may be further improved. " In addition, in view of the overall situation of the land market in 2020, the Chinese Academy of index judged that "the financing environment is tightening or will continue, and enterprises should be more adaptable to the changes of industrial regulation and control policies, and rationally take the land and actively push the market to promote their own steady growth in scale."